RTO Gas Treatment vs. Catalytic Oxidation

RTO Gas Treatment

• RTO (Regenerative Thermal Oxidation) Overview

RTO is an effective way to treat industrial air pollution. The process involves the use of combustion to eliminate harmful pollutants from gas streams. RTOs can be used in a variety of industries including chemical manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, and food processing.

• How RTO Works

The process of RTO involves a cycle of heating and cooling of the gas stream that is being treated. The gas stream enters the oxidizer where it is preheated. The gas is then directed to a combustion chamber where it is heated to a very high temperature and the pollutants are oxidized. The purified gas then exits the chamber and is directed to a heat exchanger where it is cooled before being released into the environment.

• Advantages of RTO
• High efficiency
• Low operating costs
• Reliable
• Can handle high volumes of pollutants
• Low maintenance requirements
• Disadvantages of RTO
• High capital cost
• Large physical footprint
• Not suitable for all types of pollutants

Catalytic Oxidation

• Catalytic Oxidation Overview

Catalytic oxidation is another method for treating industrial air pollution. This process involves the use of a catalyst to break down pollutants in the gas stream. Catalytic oxidation is often used in industries such as petrochemicals, automotive manufacturing, and aerospace.

• How Catalytic Oxidation Works

The gas stream enters a reactor where it comes into contact with a catalyst. The catalyst initiates a chemical reaction that breaks down the pollutants in the gas stream. The purified gas then exits the reactor and is released into the environment.

• Advantages of Catalytic Oxidation
• Lower capital cost than RTO
• Smaller physical footprint than RTO
• Effective at treating a wide range of pollutants
• Disadvantages of Catalytic Oxidation
• Higher operating costs than RTO
• Less efficient than RTO
• Can be less reliable due to the need to maintain the catalyst
• Limited ability to handle high volumes of pollutants

RTO vs. Catalytic Oxidation

• Cost Comparison

RTO has a higher capital cost than catalytic oxidation due to the need for larger equipment. However, RTO has a lower operating cost due to its high efficiency, while catalytic oxidation has a higher operating cost due to the need to replace the catalyst over time.

• Efficiency Comparison

RTO is more efficient than catalytic oxidation due to its ability to handle higher volumes of pollutants and its low energy consumption. Catalytic oxidation, on the other hand, is less efficient due to its limited ability to handle high volumes of pollutants and its higher energy consumption.

• Reliability Comparison

RTO is more reliable than catalytic oxidation due to its low maintenance requirements and its ability to handle a wide range of pollutants. Catalytic oxidation requires regular maintenance to replace the catalyst, which can result in downtime and higher maintenance costs.

Conclusion

Both RTO and catalytic oxidation are effective methods for treating industrial air pollution. The choice between the two methods depends on the specific needs of the industry. RTO is best suited for industries that require high efficiency, low operating costs, and reliable operation, while catalytic oxidation is best suited for industries with lower volumes of pollutants and where a smaller physical footprint is required.

We are a high-tech enterprise that specializes in comprehensive treatment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) waste gas, carbon reduction, and energy-saving technology for high-end equipment manufacturing. Our core technical team consists of over 60 R&D technicians, including 3 senior engineers at the researcher level and 16 senior engineers, who come from the Aerospace Liquid Rocket Engine Research Institute (Aerospace Sixth Institute). We have four core technologies: thermal energy, combustion, sealing, and automatic control. We have an ability to simulate temperature fields and air flow field simulation modeling and calculation. We also have the ability to test the performance of ceramic thermal storage materials, the selection of molecular sieve adsorption materials, and the experimental testing of the high-temperature incineration and oxidation characteristics of VOCs organic matter. With that said, we have built an RTO technology research and development center and an exhaust gas carbon reduction engineering technology center in the ancient city of Xi’an, and a 30,000m122 production base in Yangling.

Our R&D platform includes high-efficiency combustion control technology test bed, molecular sieve adsorption performance test bed, high-efficiency ceramic thermal storage technology test bed, ultra-high-temperature waste heat recovery test bed, and gas flow sealing technology test bed.

– High-efficiency combustion control technology test bed: We have a test bed that allows us to evaluate the combustion of VOCs in real-world conditions. Our platform includes a combustion chamber, control panel, and VOCs feeding system. With this platform, we can evaluate combustion efficiency, adaptability to various fuels, and the impact of varying operating conditions, like temperature and pressure.
– Molecular sieve adsorption performance test bed: Our test bed evaluates the performance of molecular sieve adsorption materials. The platform simulates the adsorption process of VOCs and evaluates factors like adsorption capacity, efficiency, and stability.
– High-efficiency ceramic thermal storage technology test bed: We have a test bed that allows us to evaluate the performance of ceramic thermal storage materials. The platform simulates the charging and discharging process of thermal storage materials and evaluates factors like thermal conductivity, specific heat, and thermal stability.
– Ultra-high-temperature waste heat recovery test bed: Our test bed evaluates the efficiency and performance of waste heat recovery systems. The platform simulates the high-temperature exhaust gas from the industrial process and evaluates factors like heat transfer efficiency and the impact of varying operating conditions.
– Gas flow sealing technology test bed: Our test bed evaluates the performance of gas flow sealing technology. The platform simulates the real operating conditions of the sealing system and evaluates factors like sealing performance, gas tightness, and durability.

We are proud of our core technologies and have applied for 68 patents, including 21 invention patents, which cover critical components. Currently, we have been granted 4 invention patents, 41 utility model patents, 6 design patents, and 7 software copyrights.

Additionally, our production capability includes steel plate, profile automatic shot blasting and painting production lines, manual shot blasting production lines, dust removal environmental protection equipment, automatic painting booths, and drying rooms.

We invite clients to work with us and would like to highlight some of our advantages:

– Rich experience in the field of VOC treatment and carbon reduction for high-end equipment manufacturing.
– Comprehensive capabilities in R&D, design, production, installation, and commissioning of VOCs treatment equipment.
– Advanced technology and equipment, and highly skilled technical professionals.
– Customized solutions tailored to meet the unique needs of each client.
– Comprehensive after-sales support and maintenance services.
– A commitment to safety, quality, and environmental protection.

We believe that we can help clients achieve their environmental goals, improve production efficiency, and reduce production costs. Let’s work together towards a greener future.

Author: Miya