China Best Sales Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer

基本訊息

型號

RTO

類型

環境監測儀器

主要功能

廢氣去除

應用

化工

品牌

雷德桑特

清潔效率

99.8%

狀態

新的

商標

雷德桑特

運輸套餐

薄膜包裹

起源

中國 浙江

產品描述

杭州瑞德森機械有限公司;,;有限公司；專業開發製造創新粉末冷卻造粒機械及相關工業廢氣處理設備。具有近20年的生產歷史；我們在中國20多個省份擁有良好的市場；部分產品出口沙烏地阿拉伯、新加坡、墨西哥、巴西，；西班牙，；美國，;俄羅斯和韓國； ETC。

規格：;

* 比現有設施更緊湊 
* 營運成本低 
* 設施使用壽命長 
* 壓力無變化

目的：;

燃燒揮發性有機化合物（VOC）的節能係統；利用熱量產生廢氣；採用陶瓷蓄熱材料（催化劑）收集99.;8%以上的廢氣餘熱；表面積大，壓力損失低；

應用：；

1.;塗裝乾燥工藝
2.;金屬印刷工藝
3.;纖維乾燥過程
4.;膠帶工藝
5.;廢棄物處理工藝
6.;半導體製造工藝
7.;抽煙，;糖果和烘焙過程
8.;石化過程； 
9.;醫藥和食品製造過程； 
10.;其他VOC產生過程

優點：；

 * 比現有設施更緊湊
 * 壓力無變化
 * 熱回收率高（95%以上）；
 * 完善的VOC處理（99.;8%以上）；
  * 設施使用壽命長
  * 營運成本低
  * 可製作圓形或四邊形

一般描述與特點：； 

1.;工作原理
 透過旋轉旋轉閥連續改變流量的操作方法

2.;過程壓力變化
  由於旋轉閥的旋轉，風向會發生順序變化，因此壓力不會變化

3.;投資成本
 約 70% 的床型

4.;安裝空間
 它是單一容器，因此結構緊湊，需要的安裝空間較小。

5.;維護
 由於旋轉閥是唯一的 1 個移動部件，因此易於維護。
 旋轉閥由於旋轉速度低，密封件很少磨損；

6.;穩定
在此過程中沒有風險，因為即使旋轉閥出現故障，它也始終打開。

7.;處理效率
 即使長時間運行，密封件也很少磨損，處理效率得以維持；

地址：浙江省杭州市經濟開發區振新中路3號

業務類型: 製造商/工廠, 貿易公司

業務範圍：化工、電氣電子、製造加工機械、安全防護

管理系統認證：ISO 9001

主要產品：造粒機、刨片機、造粒機、造粒機、化學造粒機、Vocs

公司簡介：杭州瑞德森機械有限公司，前身為杭州新特塑膠機械廠，是一家專業生產創新塑膠回收機械的企業。憑藉近20年的經驗，我們在國內20個省市自治區擁有良好的市場，部分產品出口到印尼、俄羅斯、越南等。管材撕碎回收生產線、連續退火鍍錫機、QX型PET、PE及皮殼清洗生產線、SDP雙軌塑膠回收破碎機、SJ熱切造粒機組、PVC管（五葉）生產線、PVC異型材產品門窗生產線、水中顆粒生產線以及塑膠和回收粉碎機。我們獲得了5項技術專利。

本公司注重技術改造，引進國內外先進技術，不斷開發新產品。我們的宗旨是挑戰高品質，提供最好的產品。我們正在努力實現我們的口號。讓客戶滿意是我們永恆的追求。

我們正在尋找海外客戶或代理商。如果您對我們的提案感興趣，請讓我們知道我們的哪種產品最有可能吸引您或您的客戶。如果您能給我們一些關於我們產品的市場前景的想法，我們將不勝感激。我們希望盡快收到您的有利訊息！我們的目標是希望現在或不久的將來能與您建立良好的關係。如果您有任何問題或要求，請隨時與我們聯繫。

我們也真誠歡迎您來本公司洽談業務、洽談業務。為進一步拓展市場與客戶，本公司以全新的經營理念－品質、榮譽、服務，以全新的品牌姿態迎接國內外客戶。我們正在尋找 ISO 90001 管理品質系統來滿足客戶的要求！

Are regenerative thermal oxidizers suitable for small-scale applications?

Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) are primarily designed for medium to large-scale industrial applications due to their specific characteristics and operational requirements. However, their suitability for small-scale applications depends on various factors:

• Process Exhaust Volume: The exhaust volume generated by the small-scale application plays a crucial role in determining the feasibility of using an RTO. RTOs are typically designed to handle high exhaust volumes, and if the exhaust volume from the small-scale application is too low, it may not be cost-effective or efficient to use an RTO.
• Capital and Operating Costs: RTOs can be expensive to purchase, install, and operate. The capital investment required for a small-scale application may not be justifiable when considering the relatively lower exhaust volumes and pollutant concentrations. Additionally, the operating costs, including energy consumption and maintenance, may outweigh the benefits for small-scale operations.
• Space Availability: RTOs require a significant amount of physical space for installation. Small-scale applications may have space limitations, making it challenging to accommodate the size and layout requirements of an RTO system.
• Regulatory Requirements: Small-scale applications may be subject to different regulatory requirements compared to larger industrial operations. The specific emission limits and air quality standards applicable to the small-scale application should be considered to ensure compliance. Alternative emission control technologies that are more suitable for small-scale applications, such as catalytic oxidizers or biofilters, may be available.
• Process Characteristics: The nature of the small-scale application’s exhaust stream, including the type and concentration of pollutants, can influence the choice of emission control technology. RTOs are most effective for applications with high concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). If the pollutant profile of the small-scale application is different, alternative technologies may be more appropriate.

While RTOs are generally more suitable for medium to large-scale applications, it’s important to assess the specific requirements, constraints, and cost-benefit analysis for each individual small-scale application before considering the use of an RTO. Alternative emission control technologies that are better suited for small-scale operations should also be evaluated.

Are regenerative thermal oxidizers suitable for controlling emissions from food processing operations?

Yes, regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) can be suitable for controlling emissions from food processing operations. Food processing operations often generate volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and odorous compounds that need to be controlled to comply with environmental regulations and maintain air quality. Here are some key points regarding the suitability of RTOs for controlling emissions from food processing operations:

• Emission Control: RTOs are designed to achieve high destruction efficiencies for VOCs and odorous compounds. These pollutants are oxidized within the RTO at high temperatures, typically above 95% efficiency, converting them into carbon dioxide (CO₂) and water vapor. This ensures effective control and reduction of emissions from food processing operations.
• Process Compatibility: RTOs can be integrated into the exhaust systems of various food processing operations, capturing and treating the emissions before they are released into the atmosphere. The RTO is typically connected to the process equipment or exhaust stack, allowing the VOC-laden air to pass through the oxidizer for treatment.
• Flexibility: RTOs offer flexibility in handling a wide range of operating conditions and pollutants. Food processing operations can vary in terms of flow rates, temperature, and composition of emissions. RTOs are designed to accommodate these variations and provide effective treatment even under fluctuating conditions.
• Odor Control: In addition to VOCs, food processing operations can also generate odorous compounds, which can cause nuisance and odor-related complaints. RTOs can be equipped with additional odor control technologies such as activated carbon beds or scrubbers to address odor concerns and ensure the removal of unpleasant odors.
• Compliance with Regulations: Food processing operations are subject to regulatory requirements for air quality and emissions control. RTOs are capable of achieving the necessary destruction efficiencies and can help food processors comply with environmental regulations. The use of RTOs demonstrates a commitment to sustainable practices and responsible management of air emissions.

It is important to note that the specific design and configuration of the RTO, as well as the characteristics of the food processing emissions, should be considered when implementing an RTO for a specific application. Consulting with experienced engineers or RTO manufacturers can provide valuable insights into the proper sizing, integration, and performance requirements for controlling emissions from food processing operations.

In summary, RTOs are a suitable and effective technology for controlling emissions from food processing operations, providing high destruction efficiencies, compatibility with various processes, flexibility in handling operating conditions, odor control capabilities, and compliance with environmental regulations.

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer vs. Thermal Oxidizer

When comparing a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) to a conventional thermal oxidizer, there are several key differences to consider:

1. Operation:

A regenerative thermal oxidizer operates using a cyclical process that involves heat recovery, while a thermal oxidizer typically operates in a continuous mode without heat recovery.

2. Heat Recovery:

One of the primary distinctions between the two systems is the heat recovery mechanism. An RTO utilizes heat exchanger beds filled with ceramic media or structured packing to recover heat from the outgoing gases and preheat the incoming gases, resulting in energy savings. In contrast, a thermal oxidizer does not incorporate heat recovery, leading to higher energy consumption.

3. Efficiency:

RTOs are known for their high destruction efficiency, typically above 95%, which enables effective removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants. Thermal oxidizers, on the other hand, may have slightly lower destruction efficiencies depending on the specific design and operating conditions.

4. Energy Consumption:

Due to the heat recovery mechanism, RTOs generally require less energy for operation compared to thermal oxidizers. The preheating of incoming gases in an RTO reduces the fuel consumption required for combustion, making it more energy-efficient.

5. Cost-effectiveness:

While the initial capital investment for an RTO can be higher than that of a thermal oxidizer due to the heat recovery components, the long-term operational cost savings through energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies make RTOs a cost-effective solution over the lifespan of the system.

6. Environmental Compliance:

Both RTOs and thermal oxidizers are designed to meet emissions regulations and help industries comply with air quality standards and permits. However, RTOs typically offer higher destruction efficiencies, which can enhance environmental compliance.

7. Versatility:

RTOs and thermal oxidizers are both versatile in terms of handling a wide range of process exhaust volumes and pollutant concentrations. However, RTOs are often preferred for applications where high destruction efficiencies and energy recovery are critical.

Overall, the key distinctions between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer lie in the heat recovery mechanism, energy consumption, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. RTOs offer superior energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies, making them an attractive option for industries that prioritize energy efficiency and environmental compliance.

editor by CX 2024-04-09