中國最好的Rto-蓄熱式熱氧化器

基本訊息

類型

環境監測儀器

主要功能

廢氣去除

應用

化工

品牌

雷德桑特

清潔效率

99.8%

狀態

新的

商標

雷德桑特

運輸套餐

薄膜包裹

起源

中國 浙江

產品描述

杭州瑞德森機械有限公司;,;有限公司；專業開發製造創新粉末冷卻造粒機械及相關工業廢氣處理設備。具有近20年的生產歷史；我們在中國20多個省份擁有良好的市場；部分產品出口沙烏地阿拉伯、新加坡、墨西哥、巴西，；西班牙，；美國，;俄羅斯和韓國； ETC。

規格：;

* 比現有設施更緊湊 
* 營運成本低 
* 設施使用壽命長 
* 壓力無變化

目的：;

燃燒揮發性有機化合物（VOC）的節能係統；利用熱量產生廢氣；採用陶瓷蓄熱材料（催化劑）收集99.;8%以上的廢氣餘熱；表面積大，壓力損失低；

應用：；

1.;塗裝乾燥工藝
2.;金屬印刷工藝
3.;纖維乾燥過程
4.;膠帶工藝
5.;廢棄物處理工藝
6.;半導體製造工藝
7.;抽煙，;糖果和烘焙過程
8.;石化過程； 
9.;醫藥和食品製造過程； 
10.;其他VOC產生過程

優點：；

 * 比現有設施更緊湊
 * 壓力無變化
 * 熱回收率高（95%以上）；
 * 完善的VOC處理（99.;8%以上）；
  * 設施使用壽命長
  * 營運成本低
  * 可製作圓形或四邊形

一般描述與特點：； 

1.;工作原理
 透過旋轉旋轉閥連續改變流量的操作方法

2.;過程壓力變化
  由於旋轉閥的旋轉，風向會發生順序變化，因此壓力不會變化

3.;投資成本
 約 70% 的床型

4.;安裝空間
 它是單一容器，因此結構緊湊，需要的安裝空間較小。

5.;維護
 由於旋轉閥是唯一的 1 個移動部件，因此易於維護。
 旋轉閥由於旋轉速度低，密封件很少磨損；

6.;穩定
在此過程中沒有風險，因為即使旋轉閥出現故障，它也始終打開。

7.;處理效率
 即使長時間運行，密封件也很少磨損，處理效率得以維持；

地址：浙江省杭州市經濟開發區振新中路3號

業務類型: 製造商/工廠, 貿易公司

業務範圍：化工、電氣電子、製造加工機械、安全防護

管理系統認證：ISO 9001

主要產品：造粒機、刨片機、造粒機、造粒機、化學造粒機、Vocs

公司簡介：杭州瑞德森機械有限公司，前身為杭州新特塑膠機械廠，是一家專業生產創新塑膠回收機械的企業。憑藉近20年的經驗，我們在國內20個省市自治區擁有良好的市場，部分產品出口到印尼、俄羅斯、越南等。管材撕碎回收生產線、連續退火鍍錫機、QX型PET、PE及皮殼清洗生產線、SDP雙軌塑膠回收破碎機、SJ熱切造粒機組、PVC管（五葉）生產線、PVC異型材產品門窗生產線、水中顆粒生產線以及塑膠和回收粉碎機。我們獲得了5項技術專利。

本公司注重技術改造，引進國內外先進技術，不斷開發新產品。我們的宗旨是挑戰高品質，提供最好的產品。我們正在努力實現我們的口號。讓客戶滿意是我們永恆的追求。

我們正在尋找海外客戶或代理商。如果您對我們的提案感興趣，請讓我們知道我們的哪種產品最有可能吸引您或您的客戶。如果您能給我們一些關於我們產品的市場前景的想法，我們將不勝感激。我們希望盡快收到您的有利訊息！我們的目標是希望現在或不久的將來能與您建立良好的關係。如果您有任何問題或要求，請隨時與我們聯繫。

我們也真誠歡迎您來本公司洽談業務、洽談業務。為進一步拓展市場與客戶，本公司以全新的經營理念－品質、榮譽、服務，以全新的品牌姿態迎接國內外客戶。我們正在尋找 ISO 90001 管理品質系統來滿足客戶的要求！

Can regenerative thermal oxidizers be used for odor control in sewage treatment plants?

Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) are not commonly used for odor control in sewage treatment plants. While RTOs are effective in controlling gaseous pollutants, their application for odor control in wastewater treatment facilities has certain limitations and considerations.

Here are some key points to consider regarding the use of RTOs for odor control in sewage treatment plants:

• Nature of Odorous Compounds: Odors in sewage treatment plants are primarily caused by volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and sulfur compounds released during the treatment processes. RTOs are effective in treating VOCs, but they may not be specifically designed to address sulfur compounds, which can be challenging to control through thermal oxidation.
• Operating Temperature: RTOs require high operating temperatures for efficient pollutant destruction. However, the presence of sulfur compounds in sewage treatment plant emissions can lead to corrosion and fouling at elevated temperatures, potentially impacting the performance and lifespan of the RTO system.
• Complex Odor Mixture: Odors in sewage treatment plants are often complex mixtures of various compounds. RTOs are generally designed to treat specific target pollutants and may not be optimized for the treatment of the wide range of compounds present in sewage plant odors. A comprehensive odor control strategy typically involves multiple treatment techniques tailored to the specific odor profile.
• Alternative Odor Control Technologies: Sewage treatment plants typically employ a combination of dedicated odor control technologies such as biofilters, activated carbon adsorption systems, chemical scrubbers, or other specialized methods. These technologies are specifically designed for the removal of odorous compounds and are often more suitable and efficient for odor control in wastewater treatment facilities.
• Compliance with Regulations: Odor emissions from sewage treatment plants are subject to regulatory requirements and local community sensitivities. Sewage treatment facilities need to comply with applicable regulations and implement effective odor control measures that are proven to be efficient in mitigating the specific odor issues associated with their operations.

In summary, while RTOs are effective for controlling gaseous pollutants, they are not commonly used as the primary odor control technology in sewage treatment plants. Sewage treatment facilities typically employ dedicated odor control technologies that are specifically designed for the removal of odorous compounds and can provide optimal performance and compliance with odor regulations.

What are the startup and shutdown time requirements for a regenerative thermal oxidizer?

The startup and shutdown time requirements for a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) can vary depending on several factors, including the specific design of the RTO, the size of the system, and the operating conditions. Here are some key points regarding the startup and shutdown time requirements for an RTO:

• Startup Time: The startup time for an RTO typically refers to the time it takes for the system to reach its operating temperature and stabilize for effective emission control. The startup time can range from several hours to several days, depending on the size of the RTO, the thermal capacity of the heat exchange media, and the desired operating temperature. During startup, the RTO gradually heats up the heat exchange beds or media using a burner system or other heating mechanisms until the desired temperature is reached.
• Shutdown Time: The shutdown time for an RTO refers to the time it takes to safely cool down the system and bring it to a complete stop. The shutdown time can also vary and may range from several hours to several days. During shutdown, the flow of exhaust gas is stopped, and the RTO initiates a cooling process to lower the temperature of the heat exchange media. Cooling mechanisms such as air or water may be used to expedite the cooling process and ensure safe operation.
• System Requirements: The specific startup and shutdown time requirements for an RTO are often determined by the process requirements, operational needs, and regulatory compliance. Some applications may require faster startup and shutdown times to accommodate frequent process changes, while others may prioritize energy efficiency and opt for longer startup and shutdown times to allow for heat recovery and minimize fuel consumption.
• Control Systems: Advanced control systems are typically employed to monitor and control the startup and shutdown processes of an RTO. These systems ensure that the temperature ramp-up and ramp-down rates are within safe limits and that the system operates efficiently and reliably during these phases.

It is essential to consult with RTO manufacturers or experienced engineers to determine the specific startup and shutdown time requirements for a particular RTO based on its design, size, and intended application. They can provide guidance on optimizing the startup and shutdown processes to meet the operational and regulatory needs while ensuring the safe and efficient operation of the RTO.

In summary, the startup and shutdown time requirements for an RTO can vary depending on factors such as system design, size, and operational considerations. Startup times can range from hours to days, while shutdown times can also vary. These requirements are tailored to meet the specific needs of the process and ensure effective emission control while maintaining operational safety.

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer vs. Thermal Oxidizer

When comparing a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) to a conventional thermal oxidizer, there are several key differences to consider:

1. Operation:

A regenerative thermal oxidizer operates using a cyclical process that involves heat recovery, while a thermal oxidizer typically operates in a continuous mode without heat recovery.

2. Heat Recovery:

One of the primary distinctions between the two systems is the heat recovery mechanism. An RTO utilizes heat exchanger beds filled with ceramic media or structured packing to recover heat from the outgoing gases and preheat the incoming gases, resulting in energy savings. In contrast, a thermal oxidizer does not incorporate heat recovery, leading to higher energy consumption.

3. Efficiency:

RTOs are known for their high destruction efficiency, typically above 95%, which enables effective removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants. Thermal oxidizers, on the other hand, may have slightly lower destruction efficiencies depending on the specific design and operating conditions.

4. Energy Consumption:

Due to the heat recovery mechanism, RTOs generally require less energy for operation compared to thermal oxidizers. The preheating of incoming gases in an RTO reduces the fuel consumption required for combustion, making it more energy-efficient.

5. Cost-effectiveness:

While the initial capital investment for an RTO can be higher than that of a thermal oxidizer due to the heat recovery components, the long-term operational cost savings through energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies make RTOs a cost-effective solution over the lifespan of the system.

6. Environmental Compliance:

Both RTOs and thermal oxidizers are designed to meet emissions regulations and help industries comply with air quality standards and permits. However, RTOs typically offer higher destruction efficiencies, which can enhance environmental compliance.

7. Versatility:

RTOs and thermal oxidizers are both versatile in terms of handling a wide range of process exhaust volumes and pollutant concentrations. However, RTOs are often preferred for applications where high destruction efficiencies and energy recovery are critical.

Overall, the key distinctions between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer lie in the heat recovery mechanism, energy consumption, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. RTOs offer superior energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies, making them an attractive option for industries that prioritize energy efficiency and environmental compliance.

editor by CX 2024-02-07