China Standard Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer - RTO

基本訊息

型號

RTO

類型

環境監測儀器

主要功能

廢氣去除

應用

化工

品牌

雷德桑特

清潔效率

99.8%

狀態

新的

商標

雷德桑特

運輸套餐

薄膜包裹

起源

中國浙江

產品描述

杭州瑞德森機械有限公司;,;有限公司；專業開發製造創新粉末冷卻造粒機械及相關工業廢氣處理設備。具有近20年的生產歷史；我們在中國20多個省份擁有良好的市場；部分產品出口沙烏地阿拉伯、新加坡、墨西哥、巴西，；西班牙，；美國，;俄羅斯和韓國； ETC。

規格：;

* 比現有設施更緊湊
* 營運成本低
* 設施使用壽命長
* 壓力無變化

目的：;

燃燒揮發性有機化合物（VOC）的節能係統；利用熱量產生廢氣；採用陶瓷蓄熱材料（催化劑）收集99.;8%以上的廢氣餘熱；表面積大，壓力損失低；

應用：；

1.;塗裝乾燥工藝
2.;金屬印刷工藝
3.;纖維乾燥過程
4.;膠帶工藝
5.;廢棄物處理工藝
6.;半導體製造工藝
7.;抽煙，;糖果和烘焙過程
8.;石化過程；
9.;醫藥和食品製造過程；
10.;其他VOC產生過程

優點：；

* 比現有設施更緊湊
* 壓力無變化
* 熱回收率高（95%以上）；
* 完善的VOC處理（99.;8%以上）；
* 設施使用壽命長
* 營運成本低
* 可製作圓形或四邊形

一般描述與特點：；

1.;工作原理
透過旋轉旋轉閥連續改變流量的操作方法

2.;過程壓力變化
由於旋轉閥的旋轉，風向會發生順序變化，因此壓力不會變化

3.;投資成本
約 70% 的床型

4.;安裝空間
它是單一容器，因此結構緊湊，需要的安裝空間較小。

5.;維護
由於旋轉閥是唯一的 1 個移動部件，因此易於維護。
旋轉閥由於旋轉速度低，密封件很少磨損；

6.;穩定
在此過程中沒有風險，因為即使旋轉閥出現故障，它也始終打開。

7.;處理效率
即使長時間運行，密封件也很少磨損，處理效率得以維持；

地址：浙江省杭州市經濟開發區振新中路3號

業務類型: 製造商/工廠, 貿易公司

業務範圍：化工、電氣電子、製造加工機械、安全防護

管理系統認證：ISO 9001

主要產品：造粒機、刨片機、造粒機、造粒機、化學造粒機、Vocs

公司簡介：杭州瑞德森機械有限公司，前身為杭州新特塑膠機械廠，是一家專業生產創新塑膠回收機械的企業。憑藉近20年的經驗，我們在國內20個省市自治區擁有良好的市場，部分產品出口到印尼、俄羅斯、越南等。管材撕碎回收生產線、連續退火鍍錫機、QX型PET、PE及皮殼清洗生產線、SDP雙軌塑膠回收破碎機、SJ熱切造粒機組、PVC管（五葉）生產線、PVC異型材產品門窗生產線、水中顆粒生產線以及塑膠和回收粉碎機。我們獲得了5項技術專利。

本公司注重技術改造，引進國內外先進技術，不斷開發新產品。我們的宗旨是挑戰高品質，提供最好的產品。我們正在努力實現我們的口號。讓客戶滿意是我們永恆的追求。

我們正在尋找海外客戶或代理商。如果您對我們的提案感興趣，請讓我們知道我們的哪種產品最有可能吸引您或您的客戶。如果您能給我們一些關於我們產品的市場前景的想法，我們將不勝感激。我們希望盡快收到您的有利訊息！我們的目標是希望現在或不久的將來能與您建立良好的關係。如果您有任何問題或要求，請隨時與我們聯繫。

我們也真誠歡迎您來本公司洽談業務、洽談業務。為進一步拓展市場與客戶，本公司以全新的經營理念－品質、榮譽、服務，以全新的品牌姿態迎接國內外客戶。我們正在尋找 ISO 90001 管理品質系統來滿足客戶的要求！

蓄熱式熱氧化器

Are regenerative thermal oxidizers suitable for small-scale applications?

Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) are primarily designed for medium to large-scale industrial applications due to their specific characteristics and operational requirements. However, their suitability for small-scale applications depends on various factors:

Process Exhaust Volume: The exhaust volume generated by the small-scale application plays a crucial role in determining the feasibility of using an RTO. RTOs are typically designed to handle high exhaust volumes, and if the exhaust volume from the small-scale application is too low, it may not be cost-effective or efficient to use an RTO.
Capital and Operating Costs: RTOs can be expensive to purchase, install, and operate. The capital investment required for a small-scale application may not be justifiable when considering the relatively lower exhaust volumes and pollutant concentrations. Additionally, the operating costs, including energy consumption and maintenance, may outweigh the benefits for small-scale operations.
Space Availability: RTOs require a significant amount of physical space for installation. Small-scale applications may have space limitations, making it challenging to accommodate the size and layout requirements of an RTO system.
Regulatory Requirements: Small-scale applications may be subject to different regulatory requirements compared to larger industrial operations. The specific emission limits and air quality standards applicable to the small-scale application should be considered to ensure compliance. Alternative emission control technologies that are more suitable for small-scale applications, such as catalytic oxidizers or biofilters, may be available.
Process Characteristics: The nature of the small-scale application’s exhaust stream, including the type and concentration of pollutants, can influence the choice of emission control technology. RTOs are most effective for applications with high concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). If the pollutant profile of the small-scale application is different, alternative technologies may be more appropriate.

While RTOs are generally more suitable for medium to large-scale applications, it’s important to assess the specific requirements, constraints, and cost-benefit analysis for each individual small-scale application before considering the use of an RTO. Alternative emission control technologies that are better suited for small-scale operations should also be evaluated.

蓄熱式熱氧化器

再生熱氧化器與生物過濾器的性能相比如何？

蓄熱式熱氧化器（RTO）和生物過濾器都是廣泛使用的空氣污染物處理技術，但它們的工作原理和性能特徵有所不同。以下是 RTO 和生物過濾器的性能比較：

性能方面	蓄熱式熱氧化器 (RTO)	生物過濾器
排放去除效率	RTO 在去除揮發性有機化合物 (VOC) 和有害空氣污染物 (HAP) 方面非常有效率。他們對這些污染物的破壞效率可達 95% 以上。	生物過濾器還有可能對某些揮發性有機化合物和有氣味的化合物實現高去除效率。然而，它們的性能可能會根據生物過濾器中的特定污染物和微生物活性而變化。
適用性	RTO 用途廣泛，可以處理多種污染物，包括 VOC、HAP 和有味化合物。它們非常適合高流量和高污染物濃度。	生物過濾器在處理有氣味的化合物和某些揮發性有機化合物方面特別有效。它們通常用於廢水處理設施、堆肥作業和農業設施等應用。
能源消耗	RTO 需要大量能量才能達到並維持氧化的高工作溫度。它們依靠燃料燃燒或外部熱源來獲取所需的熱能。	生物過濾器被認為是低能耗系統，因為它們依靠微生物的自然生物活性來分解污染物。它們通常不需要外部加熱或燃料消耗。
維護	RTO 通常需要定期維護和監控以確保正常運作。這包括檢查、熱交換介質的清潔以及組件的潛在維修或更換。	生物過濾器需要定期維護以優化其性能。這可能涉及監測和調整濕度水平、控制溫度以及偶爾更換過濾介質或添加微生物接種劑。
資本和營運成本	與生物過濾器相比，RTO 由於其複雜的設計、專用材料和能源密集型操作，通常具有更高的資本成本。營運成本包括燃料消耗或暖氣用電。	與 RTO 相比，生物過濾器的資本成本通常較低。它們設計更簡單，並且不需要燃料消耗。然而，營運成本可能包括定期更換過濾介質和潛在的氣味控制措施。

值得注意的是，選擇合適的技術取決於多種因素，例如待處理的特定污染物、製程條件、監管要求和特定場地的考慮因素。諮詢環境工程師或空氣污染控制專家可以幫助確定最適合特定應用的技術。

綜上所述，RTO 和生物過濾器具有不同的性能特徵，RTO 具有去除效率高、通用性強、適合高流量和高濃度應用的優點，而生物過濾器對有氣味的化合物有效，能耗低，且資本通常較低成本。

蓄熱式熱氧化器

How do regenerative thermal oxidizers compare to other air pollution control devices?

Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) are highly regarded air pollution control devices that offer several advantages over other commonly used air pollution control technologies. Here’s a comparison of RTOs with some other air pollution control devices:

Comparison	蓄熱式熱氧化器 (RTO)	Electrostatic Precipitators (ESPs)	Scrubbers
Efficiency	RTOs achieve high VOC destruction efficiency, typically exceeding 99%. They are highly effective in destroying volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs).	ESPs are effective in collecting particulate matter, such as dust and smoke, but they are less effective in destroying VOCs and HAPs.	Scrubbers are efficient in removing certain pollutants, such as gases and particulate matter, but their performance may vary depending on the specific pollutants being targeted.
適用性	RTOs are suitable for a wide range of industries and applications, including high-volume exhaust gases. They can handle varying concentrations and types of pollutants.	ESPs are commonly used for particulate matter control in applications such as power plants, cement kilns, and steel mills. They are less suitable for VOC and HAP control.	Scrubbers are widely used for removing acid gases, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) and hydrogen chloride (HCl), as well as certain odorous compounds. They are often employed in industries such as chemical manufacturing and wastewater treatment.
Energy Efficiency	RTOs incorporate heat recovery systems that allow for significant energy savings. They can achieve high thermal efficiency by preheating the incoming process air using the heat from the outgoing exhaust stream.	ESPs consume relatively low energy compared to other technologies, but they do not offer heat recovery capabilities.	Scrubbers generally consume more energy compared to RTOs and ESPs due to the energy required for liquid atomization and pumping. However, some scrubber designs may incorporate heat recovery mechanisms.
Space Requirements	RTOs typically require more space compared to ESPs and certain scrubber designs due to the need for ceramic media beds and larger combustion chambers.	ESPs have a compact design and require less space compared to RTOs and some scrubber configurations.	Scrubber designs vary in size and complexity. Certain scrubber types, such as packed bed scrubbers, may require a larger footprint compared to RTOs and ESPs.
維護	RTOs generally require regular maintenance of components such as valves, dampers, and ceramic media beds. Periodic media replacement may be necessary depending on the operating conditions.	ESPs require periodic cleaning of collection plates and electrodes. Maintenance activities involve the removal of accumulated particulate matter.	Scrubbers require maintenance of liquid circulation systems, pumps, and mist eliminators. Regular monitoring and adjustment of the chemical reagents used in the scrubbing process are also necessary.

It’s important to note that the selection of an air pollution control device depends on the specific pollutants, process conditions, regulatory requirements, and economic considerations of the industrial application. Each technology has its own advantages and limitations, and it’s essential to evaluate these factors to determine the most appropriate solution for effective air pollution control.

國標蓄熱式熱氧化爐
editor by CX 2024-02-19