Basic Info.
Model NO.
Amazing RTO
Typ
Incinerator
High Efficiency
100
Energy Saving
100
Low Maintenance
100
Easy Operation
100
Trademark
Bjamazing
Transport Package
Overseas
Specification
111
Origin
China
HS Code
2221111
Product Description
RTO
Regeneračný tepelný oxidátor
Compared with traditional catalytic combustion,; direct thermal oxidizer,; RTO has the merits of high heating efficiency,; low operation cost,; and the ability to treat large flux low concentration waste gas.; When VOCs concentration is high,; secondary heat recycle can be realized,; which will greatly reduce the operation cost.; Because RTO can preheat the waste gas by levels through ceramic heat accumulator,; which could make the waste gas to be completely heated and cracked with no dead corner(treatment efficiency>99%);,;which reduce the NOX in the Exhausting gas,; if the VOC density >1500mg/Nm3,; when the waste gas reach cracking area,; it has been heated up to cracking temperature by heat accumulator,; the burner will be closed under this condition.;
RTO can be devided into chamber type and rotary type according to difference operation mode.; Rotary type RTO has advantages in system pressure,; temperature stability,; investment amount,; etc
| RTO types | Efficiency | Pressure change (mmAq); | Size | (max);Treatment volume | |
| Treatment efficiency | Heat recycle efficiency | ||||
| Rotary type RTO | 99 % | 97 % | 0-4 | small (1 time); | 50000Nm3/h |
| Three chamber type RTO | 99 % | 97 % | 0-10 | Large (1.;5times); | 100000Nm3/h |
| Two chamber type RTO | 95 % | 95 % | 0-20 | middle (1.;2times); | 100000Nm3/h |
Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer,; Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer,; Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer,; Thermal Oxidizer,; Thermal Oxidizer,; Thermal Oxidizer,; oxidizer,; oxidizer,; oxidizer,; incinerator,; incinerator,; incinerator,; waste gas treatment,; waste gas treatment,; waste gas treatment,; VOC treatment,; VOC treatment,; VOC treatment,; RTO,; RTO,; RTO,; Rotary RTO,; Rotary RTO,; Rotary RTO,; Chamber RTO,; Chamber RTO,; Chamber RTO
Address: 8 floor, E1, Pinwei building, Dishengxi road, Yizhuang, ZheJiang , China
Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading Company
Business Range: Electrical & Electronics, Industrial Equipment & Components, Manufacturing & Processing Machinery, Metallurgy, Mineral & Energy
Management System Certification: ISO 9001, ISO 14001
Main Products: Rto, Color Coating Line, Galvanizing Line, Air Knife, Spares for Processing Line, Coater, Independent Equipments, Sink Roll, Revamping Project, Blower
Company Introduction: ZheJiang Amazing Science & Technology Co., Ltd is a thriving Hi-tech company, located in ZheJiang Economic and Technological Development Area(BDA). Adhering to the concept of Realistic, Innovative, Focused and Efficient, our company mainly serve the waste gas treatment (VOCs) Industry and metallurgical equipment of China and even whole world. We have advanced technology and rich experience in VOCs waste gas treatment project, the reference of which has been successfully applied to the industry of coating, rubber, electronic, printing, etc. We also have years of technology accumulation in the research and manufacturing of flat steel processing line, and possess nearly 100 of application example.
Our company focus on the research, design, manufacturing, installation and commissioning of VOCs organic waste gas treatment system and the revamping and updating project for energy saving and environmental protection of flat steel processing line. We can provide customers the complete solutions for environmental protection, energy saving, product quality improvement and other aspects.
We are also engaged in various spares and independent equipment for color coating line, galvanizing line, pickling line, like roller, coupler, heat exchanger, recuperator, air knife, blower, welder, tension leveler, skin pass, expansion joint, shear, jointer, stitcher, burner, radiant tube, gear motor, reducer, etc.
How do regenerative thermal oxidizers compare to catalytic oxidizers?
Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) and catalytic oxidizers are both effective technologies used for controlling air emissions from industrial processes. While they serve a similar purpose, there are significant differences in their operation, efficiency, and applicability.
Here is a comparison between RTOs and catalytic oxidizers:
| Regenerative Thermal Oxidizers (RTOs) | Catalytic Oxidizers |
|---|---|
| Operation: | Operation: |
| RTOs achieve emission control through high-temperature combustion without the use of a catalyst. They rely on the thermal oxidation process, where VOCs and other pollutants in the exhaust gas are oxidized at high temperatures (typically between 1,400°F and 1,600°F) in the presence of excess oxygen. | Catalytic oxidizers utilize a catalyst (usually a precious metal, such as platinum, palladium, or rhodium) to facilitate the oxidation of VOCs and other pollutants at lower temperatures compared to RTOs. The catalyst lowers the activation energy required for the oxidation reaction, enabling it to occur at lower temperatures (around 600°F to 900°F). |
| Efficiency: | Efficiency: |
| RTOs are known for their high thermal efficiency. They utilize a regenerative heat exchanger system that recovers and transfers heat from the treated exhaust gases to the incoming untreated gases, significantly reducing fuel consumption. This heat recovery mechanism makes RTOs energy-efficient. | Catalytic oxidizers are generally more energy-efficient than RTOs because they operate at lower temperatures. The catalyst facilitates the oxidation reaction, allowing it to occur at lower temperatures, which reduces the energy requirement for heating the exhaust gas. |
| Applicability: | Applicability: |
| RTOs are particularly suitable for applications where the pollutant concentrations are high, or where there is a wide variation in flow rates or pollutant concentrations. They are commonly used for the control of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) in various industries, including chemical manufacturing, printing, coating, and pharmaceuticals. | Catalytic oxidizers are often preferred in applications where the pollutant concentrations are relatively low and relatively constant. They are effective for VOC control in applications such as automotive painting, printing, and food processing, where the VOC concentrations can be lower and more consistent. |
| Limitations: | Limitations: |
| RTOs have higher capital costs compared to catalytic oxidizers due to their complex design and heat recovery system. They also have a higher operating temperature, which may limit their applicability in certain processes or require additional heat recovery systems. | Catalytic oxidizers can be sensitive to poisons or contaminants in the exhaust gas that can deactivate or degrade the catalyst over time. Certain compounds, such as sulfur, silicones, or halogenated compounds, can potentially poison the catalyst, reducing its effectiveness and requiring periodic catalyst replacement or regeneration. |
When selecting between an RTO and a catalytic oxidizer, it is essential to consider the specific requirements of the application, including pollutant concentrations, flow rates, temperature requirements, and cost considerations. Consulting with environmental engineering professionals or equipment manufacturers can help determine the most suitable technology for a particular emission control need.
What are the noise level requirements for regenerative thermal oxidizers in residential areas?
The noise level requirements for regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) in residential areas can vary depending on local regulations and specific circumstances. RTOs are typically designed to minimize noise emissions to ensure compliance with applicable noise regulations and to avoid disturbances to nearby residents. Here are some key points regarding noise level requirements for RTOs in residential areas:
- Noise Regulations: Different regions or jurisdictions may have specific noise regulations that apply to industrial equipment, including RTOs. These regulations typically define permissible noise levels and may vary depending on the time of day (daytime versus nighttime) and the zoning of the area (residential, commercial, or industrial).
- Noise Assessment: Prior to installing an RTO in a residential area, it is common practice to conduct a noise assessment. This assessment evaluates the expected noise levels generated by the RTO and compares them against the applicable noise regulations. The assessment considers factors such as the equipment design, operating conditions, and distance from residential properties.
- Noise Mitigation: If the noise assessment indicates that the RTO may exceed the permissible noise levels, mitigation measures can be implemented. These measures may include the use of noise barriers or enclosures around the RTO, acoustic insulation, or the installation of sound-absorbing materials to reduce noise propagation. The goal is to ensure that the noise emissions from the RTO are within the acceptable limits specified by the regulations.
- Community Engagement: In some cases, community engagement and communication with nearby residents may be necessary to address concerns related to noise emissions. This can involve sharing information about the RTO’s design, operation, and noise mitigation measures to assure residents that their concerns are being addressed and that the RTO is in compliance with the applicable regulations.
It is important to note that specific noise level requirements and mitigation measures can vary depending on the local regulations and the unique characteristics of the residential area. Consulting with local authorities, environmental agencies, or acoustic specialists can provide guidance on the specific noise level requirements and mitigation strategies that apply to RTO installations in residential areas.
In summary, the noise level requirements for RTOs in residential areas are typically governed by local regulations. Conducting a noise assessment, implementing noise mitigation measures if necessary, and engaging with the community can help ensure compliance with noise regulations and minimize disturbances to nearby residents.
Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer vs. Thermal Oxidizer
When comparing a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) to a conventional thermal oxidizer, there are several key differences to consider:
1. Operation:
A regenerative thermal oxidizer operates using a cyclical process that involves heat recovery, while a thermal oxidizer typically operates in a continuous mode without heat recovery.
2. Heat Recovery:
One of the primary distinctions between the two systems is the heat recovery mechanism. An RTO utilizes heat exchanger beds filled with ceramic media or structured packing to recover heat from the outgoing gases and preheat the incoming gases, resulting in energy savings. In contrast, a thermal oxidizer does not incorporate heat recovery, leading to higher energy consumption.
3. Efficiency:
RTOs are known for their high destruction efficiency, typically above 95%, which enables effective removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants. Thermal oxidizers, on the other hand, may have slightly lower destruction efficiencies depending on the specific design and operating conditions.
4. Energy Consumption:
Due to the heat recovery mechanism, RTOs generally require less energy for operation compared to thermal oxidizers. The preheating of incoming gases in an RTO reduces the fuel consumption required for combustion, making it more energy-efficient.
5. Cost-effectiveness:
While the initial capital investment for an RTO can be higher than that of a thermal oxidizer due to the heat recovery components, the long-term operational cost savings through energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies make RTOs a cost-effective solution over the lifespan of the system.
6. Environmental Compliance:
Both RTOs and thermal oxidizers are designed to meet emissions regulations and help industries comply with air quality standards and permits. However, RTOs typically offer higher destruction efficiencies, which can enhance environmental compliance.
7. Versatility:
RTOs and thermal oxidizers are both versatile in terms of handling a wide range of process exhaust volumes and pollutant concentrations. However, RTOs are often preferred for applications where high destruction efficiencies and energy recovery are critical.
Overall, the key distinctions between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer lie in the heat recovery mechanism, energy consumption, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. RTOs offer superior energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies, making them an attractive option for industries that prioritize energy efficiency and environmental compliance.
editor by CX 2024-02-08
SK 
EN 
ZH 
ES 
AR 
ID 
PT 
FR 
JA 
RU 
DE 
MS 
CS 
BG 
NL 
KO 
RO 
TH 
VI 
ZH_TW 
UK