China Hot selling Rto Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer

Základní informace.

Model NO.

Úžasné RTO

Typ

Spalovna

Vysoká účinnost

100

Úspora energie

100

Low Maintenance

100

Easy Operation

100

Ochranná známka

Bjamazing

Přepravní balíček

Overseas

Specifikace

111

Původ

Čína

Kód HS

2221111

Popis produktu

RTO

Regenerační tepelný oxidátor

V porovnání s tradičním katalytickým spalováním; přímé tepelné okysličovadlo,; RTO má přednost ve vysoké účinnosti vytápění; nízké provozní náklady; a schopnost zpracovávat odpadní plyn s nízkou koncentrací velkého toku; Když je koncentrace VOC vysoká,; lze realizovat sekundární recyklaci tepla,; což výrazně sníží provozní náklady.; Vzhledem k tomu, že RTO může předehřívat odpadní plyn o úrovně prostřednictvím keramického akumulátoru tepla,; což by mohlo způsobit, že se odpadní plyn úplně zahřeje a popraská bez mrtvého rohu (účinnost čištění > 99 %);,;které snižují NOX ve výfukových plynech;; pokud je hustota VOC > 1500 mg/Nm3; když odpadní plyn dosáhne oblasti praskání; byla zahřátá na teplotu praskání pomocí tepelného akumulátoru; hořák bude za těchto podmínek uzavřen.;

RTO lze rozdělit na typ komory a rotační typ podle rozdílu provozního režimu.; Rotační typ RTO má výhody v systémovém tlaku,; teplotní stabilita; výše investice,; atd

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer,; Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer,; Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer,;  Thermal Oxidizer,; Thermal Oxidizer,; Thermal Oxidizer,; oxidizer,; oxidizer,; oxidizer,; incinerator,; incinerator,; incinerator,; waste gas treatment,; waste gas treatment,; waste gas treatment,; VOC treatment,; VOC treatment,; VOC treatment,; RTO,; RTO,; RTO,; Rotary RTO,; Rotary RTO,; Rotary RTO,; Chamber RTO,; Chamber RTO,; Chamber RTO

Adresa: 8 patro, E1, budova Pinwei, Dishengxi road, Yizhuang, ZheJiang, Čína

Typ podnikání: Výrobce/Továrna, Obchodní společnost

Rozsah podnikání: Elektrika a elektronika, Průmyslová zařízení a komponenty, Stroje na výrobu a zpracování, Metalurgie, Nerosty a energie

Certifikace systému managementu: ISO 9001, ISO 14001

Hlavní produkty: Rto, barevná lakovací linka, galvanizační linka, vzduchový nůž, náhradní díly pro zpracovatelskou linku, nanášecí stroj, nezávislá zařízení, dřezový válec, projekt renovace, dmychadlo

Představení společnosti: ZheJiang Amazing Science & Technology Co., Ltd je prosperující hi-tech společnost se sídlem v oblasti hospodářského a technologického rozvoje ZheJiang (BDA). V souladu s konceptem realistického, inovativního, zaměřeného a efektivního naše společnost slouží především průmyslu zpracování odpadních plynů (VOC) a metalurgickým zařízením Číny a dokonce i celého světa. Máme pokročilou technologii a bohaté zkušenosti s projektem zpracování odpadních plynů VOCs, jehož reference byla úspěšně aplikována v průmyslu nátěrových hmot, pryže, elektroniky, polygrafie atd. Máme také roky technologické akumulace ve výzkumu a výrobě plochých linka na zpracování oceli a má téměř 100 příkladů použití.

Naše společnost se zaměřuje na výzkum, návrh, výrobu, instalaci a zprovoznění systému čištění organických odpadních plynů VOCs a projekt modernizace a aktualizace pro úsporu energie a ochranu životního prostředí linky na zpracování ploché oceli. Můžeme zákazníkům poskytnout kompletní řešení pro ochranu životního prostředí, úsporu energie, zlepšování kvality produktů a další aspekty.

Zabýváme se také různými náhradními díly a nezávislými zařízeními pro barevnou lakovací linku, galvanizační linku, mořicí linku, jako je válec, spojka, tepelný výměník, rekuperátor, vzduchový nůž, dmychadlo, svářečka, vyrovnávač napětí, skin pass, dilatační spára, smyk, spárovačka , sešívačka, hořák, sálavá trubice, převodový motor, reduktor atd.

What is the difference between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer?

A regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) and a thermal oxidizer are both types of air pollution control devices used for the treatment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other air pollutants. While they share the same purpose, there are distinct differences between the two technologies.

Here are the key differences between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer:

• Operating Principle: The fundamental difference lies in the operating principle. A thermal oxidizer operates by using high temperature alone to oxidize and destroy pollutants. It typically relies on a burner or other heat sources to raise the temperature of the exhaust gases to the required level for combustion. In contrast, an RTO utilizes a regenerative heat exchanger system to preheat the incoming exhaust gases by capturing and transferring heat from the outgoing gases. This heat exchange mechanism significantly improves the overall energy efficiency of the system.
• Rekuperace tepla: Heat recovery is a distinctive feature of an RTO. The regenerative heat exchanger in an RTO allows for the recovery of a significant amount of heat from the outgoing gases. This recovered heat is then used to preheat the incoming gases, reducing the energy consumption of the system. In a typical thermal oxidizer, heat recovery is limited or absent, resulting in higher energy requirements.
• Energetická účinnost: Due to the heat recovery mechanism, RTOs are generally more energy-efficient compared to traditional thermal oxidizers. The regenerative heat exchanger in an RTO allows for thermal efficiencies of 95% or higher, meaning that a significant portion of the energy input is recovered and utilized within the system. Thermal oxidizers, on the other hand, typically have lower thermal efficiencies.
• Operating Costs: The higher energy efficiency of RTOs translates into lower operating costs over the long term. The reduced energy consumption can result in significant savings in fuel or electricity expenses compared to thermal oxidizers. However, the initial capital investment for an RTO is generally higher than that of a thermal oxidizer due to the complexity of the regenerative heat exchanger system.
• Control of Pollutant Concentrations: RTOs are better suited for handling variable pollutant concentrations compared to thermal oxidizers. The regenerative heat exchanger system in an RTO allows for better control and adjustment of operating parameters to accommodate fluctuations in pollutant concentrations. Thermal oxidizers are typically less adaptable to varying pollutant loads.

In summary, the main differences between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer lie in the operating principle, heat recovery capabilities, energy efficiency, operating costs, and control of pollutant concentrations. RTOs offer higher energy efficiency, better control of pollutant concentrations, and lower operating costs, but they require a higher initial investment compared to traditional thermal oxidizers.

Can regenerative thermal oxidizers handle high-temperature exhaust streams?

Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) are designed to handle high-temperature exhaust streams efficiently. They are capable of accommodating exhaust gases with elevated temperatures and effectively treating them for pollutant removal. Here are some key points regarding the handling of high-temperature exhaust streams in RTOs:

• Thermal Stability: RTOs are constructed using materials that can withstand high temperatures, typically ranging from 800 to 1,500 degrees Celsius (1,472 to 2,732 degrees Fahrenheit). The combustion chamber, heat exchangers, and other components are designed to maintain their structural integrity and thermal stability under these conditions.
• Rekuperace tepla: One of the primary advantages of RTOs is their ability to recover and reuse heat from the high-temperature exhaust streams. The heat exchangers within the RTO capture the thermal energy from the outgoing exhaust gases and transfer it to the incoming process air or gas stream. This heat recovery process improves the overall energy efficiency of the system and reduces the need for additional fuel consumption.
• Effective Combustion: RTOs are equipped with combustion chambers where the high-temperature exhaust gases are directed. In the combustion chamber, the pollutants in the exhaust stream are oxidized at high temperatures, typically above the autoignition temperature of the pollutants. This ensures effective destruction of the pollutants, even in high-temperature environments.
• Heat Exchange: RTOs utilize a regenerative heat exchange system, which allows for the efficient transfer of heat between the incoming and outgoing gas streams. The heat exchange media within the RTO alternately absorbs and releases heat, enabling the preheating of the incoming gases and cooling of the outgoing gases. This heat exchange process helps maintain the desired operating temperatures within the RTO while maximizing energy recovery.
• System Design Considerations: When handling high-temperature exhaust streams, proper system design is crucial. Factors such as the choice of materials, insulation, and thermal expansion considerations are taken into account to ensure safe and efficient operation at elevated temperatures. Additionally, temperature monitoring and control systems are implemented to maintain optimal operating conditions.

It is important to note that the specific temperature limits and capabilities of an RTO may vary depending on the design, materials used, and the specific requirements of the application. Consulting with experienced engineers or RTO manufacturers can provide valuable insights into the suitability of an RTO for handling a particular high-temperature exhaust stream.

Overall, RTOs are well-suited for handling high-temperature exhaust streams, offering effective pollutant destruction, heat recovery, and energy efficiency in industrial applications.

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer vs. Thermal Oxidizer

When comparing a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) to a conventional thermal oxidizer, there are several key differences to consider:

1. Operation:

A regenerative thermal oxidizer operates using a cyclical process that involves heat recovery, while a thermal oxidizer typically operates in a continuous mode without heat recovery.

2. Heat Recovery:

One of the primary distinctions between the two systems is the heat recovery mechanism. An RTO utilizes heat exchanger beds filled with ceramic media or structured packing to recover heat from the outgoing gases and preheat the incoming gases, resulting in energy savings. In contrast, a thermal oxidizer does not incorporate heat recovery, leading to higher energy consumption.

3. Efficiency:

RTOs are known for their high destruction efficiency, typically above 95%, which enables effective removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants. Thermal oxidizers, on the other hand, may have slightly lower destruction efficiencies depending on the specific design and operating conditions.

4. Energy Consumption:

Due to the heat recovery mechanism, RTOs generally require less energy for operation compared to thermal oxidizers. The preheating of incoming gases in an RTO reduces the fuel consumption required for combustion, making it more energy-efficient.

5. Cost-effectiveness:

While the initial capital investment for an RTO can be higher than that of a thermal oxidizer due to the heat recovery components, the long-term operational cost savings through energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies make RTOs a cost-effective solution over the lifespan of the system.

6. Environmental Compliance:

Both RTOs and thermal oxidizers are designed to meet emissions regulations and help industries comply with air quality standards and permits. However, RTOs typically offer higher destruction efficiencies, which can enhance environmental compliance.

7. Versatility:

RTOs and thermal oxidizers are both versatile in terms of handling a wide range of process exhaust volumes and pollutant concentrations. However, RTOs are often preferred for applications where high destruction efficiencies and energy recovery are critical.

Overall, the key distinctions between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer lie in the heat recovery mechanism, energy consumption, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. RTOs offer superior energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies, making them an attractive option for industries that prioritize energy efficiency and environmental compliance.

editor by Dream 2024-04-30