China Hot selling Rto Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer

Maklumat Asas.

Model NO.

RTO yang menakjubkan

taip

Insinerator

Kecekapan Tinggi

100

Penjimatan Tenaga

100

Penyelenggaraan Rendah

100

Operasi Mudah

100

Tanda dagangan

Bjamazing

Pakej Pengangkutan

Luar negara

Spesifikasi

111

asal usul

China

Kod HS

2221111

Penerangan Produk

RTO

Pengoksida Terma Penjanaan Semula

Berbanding dengan pembakaran pemangkin tradisional,; pengoksida haba langsung,; RTO mempunyai merit kecekapan pemanasan yang tinggi,; kos operasi yang rendah,; dan keupayaan untuk merawat gas buangan kepekatan rendah fluks besar.; Apabila kepekatan VOC tinggi,; kitar semula haba sekunder boleh direalisasikan,; yang akan mengurangkan kos operasi.; Kerana RTO boleh memanaskan gas sisa mengikut tahap melalui penumpuk haba seramik,; yang boleh membuat gas buangan dipanaskan sepenuhnya dan retak tanpa sudut mati (kecekapan rawatan> 99%);,; yang mengurangkan NOX dalam gas yang meletihkan,; jika ketumpatan VOC >1500mg/Nm3,; apabila gas buangan mencapai kawasan retak,; ia telah dipanaskan sehingga suhu retak oleh penumpuk haba,; penunu akan ditutup di bawah keadaan ini.;

RTO boleh dibahagikan kepada jenis ruang dan jenis berputar mengikut mod operasi perbezaan.; RTO jenis Rotary mempunyai kelebihan dalam tekanan sistem,; kestabilan suhu,; jumlah pelaburan,; dll

Pengoksida Terma Penjanaan Semula,; Pengoksida Terma Penjanaan Semula,; Pengoksida Terma Penjanaan Semula,; Pengoksida Terma,; Pengoksida Terma,; Pengoksida Terma,; pengoksida,; pengoksida,; pengoksida,; insinerator,; insinerator,; insinerator,; rawatan gas buangan,; rawatan gas buangan,; rawatan gas buangan,; rawatan VOC,; rawatan VOC,; rawatan VOC,; RTO,; RTO,; RTO,; Rotary RTO,; Rotary RTO,; Rotary RTO,; RTO Dewan,; RTO Dewan,; RTO Dewan

Alamat: tingkat 8, E1, bangunan Pinwei, jalan Dishengxi, Yizhuang, ZheJiang, China

Jenis Perniagaan: Pengeluar/Kilang, Syarikat Perdagangan

Julat Perniagaan: Elektrik & Elektronik, Peralatan & Komponen Industri, Jentera Pembuatan & Pemprosesan, Metalurgi, Mineral & Tenaga

Pensijilan Sistem Pengurusan: ISO 9001, ISO 14001

Produk Utama: Rto, Talian Salutan Warna, Talian Galvanisasi, Pisau Udara, Alat Ganti untuk Talian Pemprosesan, Coater, Peralatan Bebas, Gulung Sink, Projek Ubahsuai, Blower

Pengenalan Syarikat: ZheJiang Amazing Science & Technology Co., Ltd ialah sebuah syarikat berteknologi tinggi yang berkembang maju, terletak di ZheJiang Economic and Technological Development Area(BDA). Berpegang kepada konsep Realistik, Inovatif, Fokus dan Cekap, syarikat kami menyediakan perkhidmatan terutamanya dalam industri rawatan gas sisa (VOC) dan peralatan metalurgi China dan juga seluruh dunia. Kami mempunyai teknologi canggih dan pengalaman yang kaya dalam projek rawatan gas buangan VOC, yang rujukannya telah berjaya digunakan untuk industri salutan, getah, elektronik, percetakan, dll. Kami juga mempunyai pengumpulan teknologi selama bertahun-tahun dalam penyelidikan dan pembuatan flat talian pemprosesan keluli, dan mempunyai hampir 100 contoh aplikasi.

Syarikat kami menumpukan pada penyelidikan, reka bentuk, pengilangan, pemasangan dan pentauliahan sistem rawatan gas sisa organik VOC dan projek merombak dan mengemas kini untuk penjimatan tenaga dan perlindungan alam sekitar barisan pemprosesan keluli rata. Kami boleh menyediakan pelanggan penyelesaian lengkap untuk perlindungan alam sekitar, penjimatan tenaga, peningkatan kualiti produk dan aspek lain.

Kami juga terlibat dalam pelbagai alat ganti dan peralatan bebas untuk garis salutan warna, garis galvanizing, garis penjerukan, seperti penggelek, pengganding, penukar haba, recuperator, pisau udara, peniup, pengimpal, penyamara ketegangan, pas kulit, sambungan pengembangan, ricih, penyambung , penjahit, penunu, tiub berseri, motor gear, pengurang, dsb.

What is the difference between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer?

A regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) and a thermal oxidizer are both types of air pollution control devices used for the treatment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other air pollutants. While they share the same purpose, there are distinct differences between the two technologies.

Here are the key differences between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer:

• Prinsip Operasi: The fundamental difference lies in the operating principle. A thermal oxidizer operates by using high temperature alone to oxidize and destroy pollutants. It typically relies on a burner or other heat sources to raise the temperature of the exhaust gases to the required level for combustion. In contrast, an RTO utilizes a regenerative heat exchanger system to preheat the incoming exhaust gases by capturing and transferring heat from the outgoing gases. This heat exchange mechanism significantly improves the overall energy efficiency of the system.
• Pemulihan Haba: Heat recovery is a distinctive feature of an RTO. The regenerative heat exchanger in an RTO allows for the recovery of a significant amount of heat from the outgoing gases. This recovered heat is then used to preheat the incoming gases, reducing the energy consumption of the system. In a typical thermal oxidizer, heat recovery is limited or absent, resulting in higher energy requirements.
• Energy Efficiency: Due to the heat recovery mechanism, RTOs are generally more energy-efficient compared to traditional thermal oxidizers. The regenerative heat exchanger in an RTO allows for thermal efficiencies of 95% or higher, meaning that a significant portion of the energy input is recovered and utilized within the system. Thermal oxidizers, on the other hand, typically have lower thermal efficiencies.
• Operating Costs: The higher energy efficiency of RTOs translates into lower operating costs over the long term. The reduced energy consumption can result in significant savings in fuel or electricity expenses compared to thermal oxidizers. However, the initial capital investment for an RTO is generally higher than that of a thermal oxidizer due to the complexity of the regenerative heat exchanger system.
• Control of Pollutant Concentrations: RTOs are better suited for handling variable pollutant concentrations compared to thermal oxidizers. The regenerative heat exchanger system in an RTO allows for better control and adjustment of operating parameters to accommodate fluctuations in pollutant concentrations. Thermal oxidizers are typically less adaptable to varying pollutant loads.

In summary, the main differences between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer lie in the operating principle, heat recovery capabilities, energy efficiency, operating costs, and control of pollutant concentrations. RTOs offer higher energy efficiency, better control of pollutant concentrations, and lower operating costs, but they require a higher initial investment compared to traditional thermal oxidizers.

Can regenerative thermal oxidizers handle high-temperature exhaust streams?

Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) are designed to handle high-temperature exhaust streams efficiently. They are capable of accommodating exhaust gases with elevated temperatures and effectively treating them for pollutant removal. Here are some key points regarding the handling of high-temperature exhaust streams in RTOs:

• Thermal Stability: RTOs are constructed using materials that can withstand high temperatures, typically ranging from 800 to 1,500 degrees Celsius (1,472 to 2,732 degrees Fahrenheit). The combustion chamber, heat exchangers, and other components are designed to maintain their structural integrity and thermal stability under these conditions.
• Pemulihan Haba: One of the primary advantages of RTOs is their ability to recover and reuse heat from the high-temperature exhaust streams. The heat exchangers within the RTO capture the thermal energy from the outgoing exhaust gases and transfer it to the incoming process air or gas stream. This heat recovery process improves the overall energy efficiency of the system and reduces the need for additional fuel consumption.
• Effective Combustion: RTOs are equipped with combustion chambers where the high-temperature exhaust gases are directed. In the combustion chamber, the pollutants in the exhaust stream are oxidized at high temperatures, typically above the autoignition temperature of the pollutants. This ensures effective destruction of the pollutants, even in high-temperature environments.
• Heat Exchange: RTOs utilize a regenerative heat exchange system, which allows for the efficient transfer of heat between the incoming and outgoing gas streams. The heat exchange media within the RTO alternately absorbs and releases heat, enabling the preheating of the incoming gases and cooling of the outgoing gases. This heat exchange process helps maintain the desired operating temperatures within the RTO while maximizing energy recovery.
• System Design Considerations: When handling high-temperature exhaust streams, proper system design is crucial. Factors such as the choice of materials, insulation, and thermal expansion considerations are taken into account to ensure safe and efficient operation at elevated temperatures. Additionally, temperature monitoring and control systems are implemented to maintain optimal operating conditions.

It is important to note that the specific temperature limits and capabilities of an RTO may vary depending on the design, materials used, and the specific requirements of the application. Consulting with experienced engineers or RTO manufacturers can provide valuable insights into the suitability of an RTO for handling a particular high-temperature exhaust stream.

Overall, RTOs are well-suited for handling high-temperature exhaust streams, offering effective pollutant destruction, heat recovery, and energy efficiency in industrial applications.

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer vs. Thermal Oxidizer

When comparing a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) to a conventional thermal oxidizer, there are several key differences to consider:

1. Operation:

A regenerative thermal oxidizer operates using a cyclical process that involves heat recovery, while a thermal oxidizer typically operates in a continuous mode without heat recovery.

2. Heat Recovery:

One of the primary distinctions between the two systems is the heat recovery mechanism. An RTO utilizes heat exchanger beds filled with ceramic media or structured packing to recover heat from the outgoing gases and preheat the incoming gases, resulting in energy savings. In contrast, a thermal oxidizer does not incorporate heat recovery, leading to higher energy consumption.

3. Efficiency:

RTOs are known for their high destruction efficiency, typically above 95%, which enables effective removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants. Thermal oxidizers, on the other hand, may have slightly lower destruction efficiencies depending on the specific design and operating conditions.

4. Energy Consumption:

Due to the heat recovery mechanism, RTOs generally require less energy for operation compared to thermal oxidizers. The preheating of incoming gases in an RTO reduces the fuel consumption required for combustion, making it more energy-efficient.

5. Cost-effectiveness:

While the initial capital investment for an RTO can be higher than that of a thermal oxidizer due to the heat recovery components, the long-term operational cost savings through energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies make RTOs a cost-effective solution over the lifespan of the system.

6. Environmental Compliance:

Both RTOs and thermal oxidizers are designed to meet emissions regulations and help industries comply with air quality standards and permits. However, RTOs typically offer higher destruction efficiencies, which can enhance environmental compliance.

7. Versatility:

RTOs and thermal oxidizers are both versatile in terms of handling a wide range of process exhaust volumes and pollutant concentrations. However, RTOs are often preferred for applications where high destruction efficiencies and energy recovery are critical.

Overall, the key distinctions between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer lie in the heat recovery mechanism, energy consumption, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. RTOs offer superior energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies, making them an attractive option for industries that prioritize energy efficiency and environmental compliance.

editor by Dream 2024-04-30