China Good quality Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO)

Maklumat Asas.

Model NO.

RTO

Punca Tarikan

Kawalan Pencemaran Udara

Kaedah Pemprosesan

Pembakaran

Tanda dagangan

RUIMA

asal usul

China

Kod HS

84213990

Penerangan Produk

Pengoksida Terma Penjanaan Semula (RTO);
Teknik pengoksidaan yang paling banyak digunakan pada masa kini untuk
Pengurangan pelepasan VOC,; sesuai untuk merawat pelbagai pelarut dan proses.; Bergantung pada isipadu udara dan kecekapan penulenan yang diperlukan,; RTO datang dengan 2,; 3,; 5 atau 10 bilik.;

Kelebihan
Pelbagai VOC untuk dirawat
Kos penyelenggaraan yang rendah
Kecekapan Terma Tinggi
Tidak menjana sebarang pembaziran
Boleh disesuaikan untuk kecil,; aliran udara sederhana dan besar
Pemulihan Haba melalui pintasan jika kepekatan VOC melebihi titik auto-terma

Auto-terma dan Pemulihan Haba:;
Kecekapan Terma > 95%
Titik auto-terma pada 1.;2 – 1.;7 mgC/Nm3
Julat aliran udara dari 2,; 000 hingga 200,; 000m3/j

Kemusnahan VOC yang tinggi
Kecekapan penulenan biasanya melebihi 99%

Address: No 3 North Xihu (West Lake) Dis. Road, Xihu (West Lake) Dis., HangZhou, ZheJiang , China

Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory

Business Range: Manufacturing & Processing Machinery, Service

Management System Certification: ISO 14001, ISO 9001, OHSAS/ OHSMS 18001, QHSE

Main Products: Dryer, Extruder, Heater, Twin Screw Extruder, Electrochemical Corrosion Protection Equ, Screw, Mixer, Pelletizing Machine, Compressor, Pelletizer

Company Introduction: The Res. Inst of Chem. Mach of the Ministry of Chemical Industry was founded in ZheJiang in 1958, and moved to HangZhou in 1965.

The Res. Inst of Automation Kementerian Industri Kimia telah diasaskan di HangZhou pada tahun 1963.

Pada tahun 1997, Res. Inst. Daripada Chem. Mach Kementerian Industri Kimia dan Res. Inst. Automasi Kementerian Industri Kimia telah digabungkan untuk menjadi Res. Inst of Chemical Machinery and Automation of Kementerian Industri Kimia.

Pada tahun 2000, Res. Inst of Chemical Machinery and Automation of Ministry of ChemicalIndustry menyelesaikan transformasinya kepada perusahaan dan didaftarkan sebagai CHINAMFG Instituteof Chemical Machinery and Automation.

Institut Tianhua mempunyai institusi subordinat berikut:

Pusat Penyeliaan dan Pemeriksaan Kualiti Peralatan Kimia di HangZhou, Wilayah ZheJiang

Institut Peralatan HangZhou di HangZhou, Wilayah ZheJiang;

Institut Automasi di HangZhou, Wilayah ZheJiang;

HangZhou Ruima Chemical Machinery Co Ltd di HangZhou, Wilayah ZheJiang;

HangZhou Ruide Drying Technology Co Ltd di HangZhou, Wilayah ZheJiang;

HangZhouLantai Plastics Machinery Co Ltd di HangZhou, Wilayah ZheJiang;

ZheJiang Airuike Automation Technology Co Ltd di HangZhou, Wilayah ZheJiang;

Institut Jentera Kimia dan automasi HangZhou United dan Institut Relau Industri Petrokimia HangZhou United diasaskan oleh Institut CHINAMFG dan Sinopec.

Institut Tianhua mempunyai kawasan pekerjaan seluas 80 000m2 dan jumlah aset 1 Yuan (RMB). Nilai keluaran tahunan ialah 1 Yuan (RMB).

Institut Tianhua mempunyai kira-kira 916 pekerja, 75% daripada mereka adalah kakitangan profesional. Antaranya ialah 23 profesor, 249jurutera kanan, 226 jurutera. 29 profesor dan jurutera kanan menikmati subsidi khas negara, Kepada 5 orang gelaran Pakar Pertengahan Umur dan Muda dengan Sumbangan Cemerlang kepada RR China dianugerahkan

Can regenerative thermal oxidizers be used for odor control in sewage treatment plants?

Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) are not commonly used for odor control in sewage treatment plants. While RTOs are effective in controlling gaseous pollutants, their application for odor control in wastewater treatment facilities has certain limitations and considerations.

Here are some key points to consider regarding the use of RTOs for odor control in sewage treatment plants:

• Nature of Odorous Compounds: Odors in sewage treatment plants are primarily caused by volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and sulfur compounds released during the treatment processes. RTOs are effective in treating VOCs, but they may not be specifically designed to address sulfur compounds, which can be challenging to control through thermal oxidation.
• Operating Temperature: RTOs require high operating temperatures for efficient pollutant destruction. However, the presence of sulfur compounds in sewage treatment plant emissions can lead to corrosion and fouling at elevated temperatures, potentially impacting the performance and lifespan of the RTO system.
• Complex Odor Mixture: Odors in sewage treatment plants are often complex mixtures of various compounds. RTOs are generally designed to treat specific target pollutants and may not be optimized for the treatment of the wide range of compounds present in sewage plant odors. A comprehensive odor control strategy typically involves multiple treatment techniques tailored to the specific odor profile.
• Alternative Odor Control Technologies: Sewage treatment plants typically employ a combination of dedicated odor control technologies such as biofilters, activated carbon adsorption systems, chemical scrubbers, or other specialized methods. These technologies are specifically designed for the removal of odorous compounds and are often more suitable and efficient for odor control in wastewater treatment facilities.
• Pematuhan dengan Peraturan: Odor emissions from sewage treatment plants are subject to regulatory requirements and local community sensitivities. Sewage treatment facilities need to comply with applicable regulations and implement effective odor control measures that are proven to be efficient in mitigating the specific odor issues associated with their operations.

In summary, while RTOs are effective for controlling gaseous pollutants, they are not commonly used as the primary odor control technology in sewage treatment plants. Sewage treatment facilities typically employ dedicated odor control technologies that are specifically designed for the removal of odorous compounds and can provide optimal performance and compliance with odor regulations.

Can regenerative thermal oxidizers handle corrosive exhaust gases?

Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) can be designed to handle corrosive exhaust gases effectively. However, the ability of an RTO to handle corrosive gases depends on several factors, including the choice of construction materials, operating conditions, and the specific corrosive nature of the exhaust gases. Here are some key points regarding the handling of corrosive exhaust gases in RTOs:

• Material Selection: The selection of appropriate construction materials is crucial when dealing with corrosive gases. RTOs can be constructed using materials that offer high resistance to corrosion, such as stainless steel, corrosion-resistant alloys (e.g., Hastelloy, Inconel), or coated materials. The choice of materials depends on the specific corrosive compounds present in the exhaust gases and their concentrations.
• Corrosion-Resistant Coatings: In addition to selecting corrosion-resistant materials, applying protective coatings can enhance the resistance of the RTO components to corrosive gases. Coatings such as ceramic coatings, epoxy coatings, or acid-resistant paints can provide an extra layer of protection against corrosion.
• Temperature Control: Maintaining appropriate operating temperatures in the RTO can help mitigate the corrosive effects of the exhaust gases. Higher temperatures can promote the decomposition of corrosive compounds, reducing their corrosive potential. Additionally, operating at higher temperatures can enhance the self-cleaning effect and prevent the accumulation of corrosive deposits on the surfaces.
• Gas Conditioning: Prior to entering the RTO, the exhaust gases can undergo gas conditioning processes to reduce their corrosive nature. This may involve pre-treatment methods such as scrubbing or neutralization to remove or neutralize corrosive compounds and reduce their concentration.
• Monitoring and Maintenance: Regular monitoring of the RTO performance and periodic maintenance are essential to ensure the effective handling of corrosive exhaust gases. Monitoring systems can track variables such as temperature, pressure, and gas composition to detect any deviations that may indicate corrosion-related issues. Proper maintenance, including cleaning and inspection of the components, helps identify and address any corrosion concerns in a timely manner.

It is important to note that the corrosiveness of exhaust gases can vary significantly depending on the specific industrial process and the pollutants involved. Therefore, when designing an RTO for handling corrosive gases, it is advisable to consult with experienced engineers or RTO manufacturers who can provide guidance on the appropriate design considerations and material selection.

By employing suitable materials, coatings, temperature control, gas conditioning, and maintenance practices, RTOs can effectively handle corrosive exhaust gases while ensuring their long-term performance and durability.

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer vs. Thermal Oxidizer

When comparing a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) to a conventional thermal oxidizer, there are several key differences to consider:

1. Operation:

A regenerative thermal oxidizer operates using a cyclical process that involves heat recovery, while a thermal oxidizer typically operates in a continuous mode without heat recovery.

2. Heat Recovery:

One of the primary distinctions between the two systems is the heat recovery mechanism. An RTO utilizes heat exchanger beds filled with ceramic media or structured packing to recover heat from the outgoing gases and preheat the incoming gases, resulting in energy savings. In contrast, a thermal oxidizer does not incorporate heat recovery, leading to higher energy consumption.

3. Efficiency:

RTOs are known for their high destruction efficiency, typically above 95%, which enables effective removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants. Thermal oxidizers, on the other hand, may have slightly lower destruction efficiencies depending on the specific design and operating conditions.

4. Energy Consumption:

Due to the heat recovery mechanism, RTOs generally require less energy for operation compared to thermal oxidizers. The preheating of incoming gases in an RTO reduces the fuel consumption required for combustion, making it more energy-efficient.

5. Cost-effectiveness:

While the initial capital investment for an RTO can be higher than that of a thermal oxidizer due to the heat recovery components, the long-term operational cost savings through energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies make RTOs a cost-effective solution over the lifespan of the system.

6. Environmental Compliance:

Both RTOs and thermal oxidizers are designed to meet emissions regulations and help industries comply with air quality standards and permits. However, RTOs typically offer higher destruction efficiencies, which can enhance environmental compliance.

7. Versatility:

RTOs and thermal oxidizers are both versatile in terms of handling a wide range of process exhaust volumes and pollutant concentrations. However, RTOs are often preferred for applications where high destruction efficiencies and energy recovery are critical.

Overall, the key distinctions between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer lie in the heat recovery mechanism, energy consumption, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. RTOs offer superior energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies, making them an attractive option for industries that prioritize energy efficiency and environmental compliance.

editor by CX 2023-09-27