China Hot selling Rto Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer

Основна информация.

Модел NO.

Невероятен RTO

Тип

Инсинератор

Висока ефективност

100

Икономия на енергия

100

Ниска поддръжка

100

Лесна работа

100

Търговска марка

Бямазинг

Транспортен пакет

Зад граница

Спецификация

111

Произход

Китай

Код по ХС

2221111

Описание на продукта

RTO

Регенеративен термичен окислител

В сравнение с традиционното каталитично изгаряне; директен термичен окислител; RTO има предимствата на висока ефективност на отопление; ниски експлоатационни разходи; и способността за третиране на голям поток отпадъчни газове с ниска концентрация.; Когато концентрацията на ЛОС е висока,; може да се реализира вторично рециклиране на топлина; което значително ще намали оперативните разходи.; Тъй като RTO може предварително да загрява отпадъчния газ по нива чрез керамичен акумулатор на топлина; което може да накара отпадъчния газ да бъде напълно нагрят и напукан без мъртъв ъгъл (ефективност на третиране>99%);,;които намаляват NOX в отработения газ,; ако плътността на VOC >1500mg/Nm3,; когато отпадъчният газ достигне зоната на напукване; нагрят е до температура на напукване от топлинен акумулатор; при това условие горелката ще бъде затворена.;

RTO може да бъде разделен на камерен тип и ротационен тип според различния режим на работа.; Ротационен тип RTO има предимства в системното налягане; температурна стабилност,; сума на инвестицията; и т.н

Регенеративен термичен окислител; Регенеративен термичен окислител; Регенеративен термичен окислител; Термичен окислител; Термичен окислител; Термичен окислител; окислител,; окислител,; окислител,; инсинератор,; инсинератор,; инсинератор,; обработка на отпадъчни газове; обработка на отпадъчни газове; обработка на отпадъчни газове; Третиране на ЛОС; Третиране на ЛОС; Третиране на ЛОС; RTO,; RTO,; RTO,; Ротационен RTO,; Ротационен RTO,; Ротационен RTO,; Камера RTO,; Камера RTO,; Камера RTO

Адрес: 8 етаж, E1, сграда Pinwei, път Dishengxi, Yizhuang, ZheJiang, Китай

Тип бизнес: производител/фабрика, търговска компания

Бизнес диапазон: Електротехника и електроника, Индустриално оборудване и компоненти, Машини за производство и обработка, Металургия, Минерали и енергия

Сертифициране на системата за управление: ISO 9001, ISO 14001

Основни продукти: Rto, линия за цветно покритие, линия за поцинковане, въздушен нож, резервни части за производствена линия, машина за нанасяне на покритие, независимо оборудване, ролка за мивки, проект за обновяване, вентилатор

Представяне на компанията: ZheJiang Amazing Science & Technology Co., Ltd е процъфтяваща високотехнологична компания, разположена в зоната за икономическо и технологично развитие на ZheJiang (BDA). Придържайки се към концепцията за реалистични, иновативни, фокусирани и ефективни, нашата компания обслужва главно обработката на отпадъчни газове (ЛОС) промишлеността и металургичното оборудване на Китай и дори на целия свят. Разполагаме с напреднали технологии и богат опит в проекта за третиране на отпадъчни газове с летливи органични съединения, чието позоваване е успешно приложено в индустрията за покрития, каучук, електроника, печат и т.н. Също така имаме години натрупване на технологии в изследването и производството на плоски линия за обработка на стомана и притежава близо 100 примера за приложение.

Нашата компания се фокусира върху проучването, проектирането, производството, инсталирането и пускането в експлоатация на система за третиране на органични отпадъчни газове с ЛОС и проект за обновяване и актуализиране на енергоспестяване и опазване на околната среда на линия за обработка на плоска стомана. Ние можем да предоставим на клиентите цялостни решения за опазване на околната среда, енергоспестяване, подобряване на качеството на продуктите и други аспекти.

Ние също така се занимаваме с различни резервни части и независимо оборудване за линия за цветно покритие, линия за поцинковане, линия за ецване, като валяк, съединител, топлообменник, рекуператор, въздушен нож, вентилатор, заварчик, изравнител на опън, кожен проход, разширителна фуга, срязване, фуги , шевна машина, горелка, лъчиста тръба, редуктор, редуктор и др.

What is the difference between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer?

A regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) and a thermal oxidizer are both types of air pollution control devices used for the treatment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other air pollutants. While they share the same purpose, there are distinct differences between the two technologies.

Here are the key differences between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer:

• Operating Principle: The fundamental difference lies in the operating principle. A thermal oxidizer operates by using high temperature alone to oxidize and destroy pollutants. It typically relies on a burner or other heat sources to raise the temperature of the exhaust gases to the required level for combustion. In contrast, an RTO utilizes a regenerative heat exchanger system to preheat the incoming exhaust gases by capturing and transferring heat from the outgoing gases. This heat exchange mechanism significantly improves the overall energy efficiency of the system.
• Възстановяване на топлина: Heat recovery is a distinctive feature of an RTO. The regenerative heat exchanger in an RTO allows for the recovery of a significant amount of heat from the outgoing gases. This recovered heat is then used to preheat the incoming gases, reducing the energy consumption of the system. In a typical thermal oxidizer, heat recovery is limited or absent, resulting in higher energy requirements.
• Energy Efficiency: Due to the heat recovery mechanism, RTOs are generally more energy-efficient compared to traditional thermal oxidizers. The regenerative heat exchanger in an RTO allows for thermal efficiencies of 95% or higher, meaning that a significant portion of the energy input is recovered and utilized within the system. Thermal oxidizers, on the other hand, typically have lower thermal efficiencies.
• Operating Costs: The higher energy efficiency of RTOs translates into lower operating costs over the long term. The reduced energy consumption can result in significant savings in fuel or electricity expenses compared to thermal oxidizers. However, the initial capital investment for an RTO is generally higher than that of a thermal oxidizer due to the complexity of the regenerative heat exchanger system.
• Control of Pollutant Concentrations: RTOs are better suited for handling variable pollutant concentrations compared to thermal oxidizers. The regenerative heat exchanger system in an RTO allows for better control and adjustment of operating parameters to accommodate fluctuations in pollutant concentrations. Thermal oxidizers are typically less adaptable to varying pollutant loads.

In summary, the main differences between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer lie in the operating principle, heat recovery capabilities, energy efficiency, operating costs, and control of pollutant concentrations. RTOs offer higher energy efficiency, better control of pollutant concentrations, and lower operating costs, but they require a higher initial investment compared to traditional thermal oxidizers.

Can regenerative thermal oxidizers handle high-temperature exhaust streams?

Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) are designed to handle high-temperature exhaust streams efficiently. They are capable of accommodating exhaust gases with elevated temperatures and effectively treating them for pollutant removal. Here are some key points regarding the handling of high-temperature exhaust streams in RTOs:

• Thermal Stability: RTOs are constructed using materials that can withstand high temperatures, typically ranging from 800 to 1,500 degrees Celsius (1,472 to 2,732 degrees Fahrenheit). The combustion chamber, heat exchangers, and other components are designed to maintain their structural integrity and thermal stability under these conditions.
• Възстановяване на топлина: One of the primary advantages of RTOs is their ability to recover and reuse heat from the high-temperature exhaust streams. The heat exchangers within the RTO capture the thermal energy from the outgoing exhaust gases and transfer it to the incoming process air or gas stream. This heat recovery process improves the overall energy efficiency of the system and reduces the need for additional fuel consumption.
• Effective Combustion: RTOs are equipped with combustion chambers where the high-temperature exhaust gases are directed. In the combustion chamber, the pollutants in the exhaust stream are oxidized at high temperatures, typically above the autoignition temperature of the pollutants. This ensures effective destruction of the pollutants, even in high-temperature environments.
• Heat Exchange: RTOs utilize a regenerative heat exchange system, which allows for the efficient transfer of heat between the incoming and outgoing gas streams. The heat exchange media within the RTO alternately absorbs and releases heat, enabling the preheating of the incoming gases and cooling of the outgoing gases. This heat exchange process helps maintain the desired operating temperatures within the RTO while maximizing energy recovery.
• System Design Considerations: When handling high-temperature exhaust streams, proper system design is crucial. Factors such as the choice of materials, insulation, and thermal expansion considerations are taken into account to ensure safe and efficient operation at elevated temperatures. Additionally, temperature monitoring and control systems are implemented to maintain optimal operating conditions.

It is important to note that the specific temperature limits and capabilities of an RTO may vary depending on the design, materials used, and the specific requirements of the application. Consulting with experienced engineers or RTO manufacturers can provide valuable insights into the suitability of an RTO for handling a particular high-temperature exhaust stream.

Overall, RTOs are well-suited for handling high-temperature exhaust streams, offering effective pollutant destruction, heat recovery, and energy efficiency in industrial applications.

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer vs. Thermal Oxidizer

When comparing a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) to a conventional thermal oxidizer, there are several key differences to consider:

1. Operation:

A regenerative thermal oxidizer operates using a cyclical process that involves heat recovery, while a thermal oxidizer typically operates in a continuous mode without heat recovery.

2. Heat Recovery:

One of the primary distinctions between the two systems is the heat recovery mechanism. An RTO utilizes heat exchanger beds filled with ceramic media or structured packing to recover heat from the outgoing gases and preheat the incoming gases, resulting in energy savings. In contrast, a thermal oxidizer does not incorporate heat recovery, leading to higher energy consumption.

3. Efficiency:

RTOs are known for their high destruction efficiency, typically above 95%, which enables effective removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other pollutants. Thermal oxidizers, on the other hand, may have slightly lower destruction efficiencies depending on the specific design and operating conditions.

4. Energy Consumption:

Due to the heat recovery mechanism, RTOs generally require less energy for operation compared to thermal oxidizers. The preheating of incoming gases in an RTO reduces the fuel consumption required for combustion, making it more energy-efficient.

5. Cost-effectiveness:

While the initial capital investment for an RTO can be higher than that of a thermal oxidizer due to the heat recovery components, the long-term operational cost savings through energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies make RTOs a cost-effective solution over the lifespan of the system.

6. Environmental Compliance:

Both RTOs and thermal oxidizers are designed to meet emissions regulations and help industries comply with air quality standards and permits. However, RTOs typically offer higher destruction efficiencies, which can enhance environmental compliance.

7. Versatility:

RTOs and thermal oxidizers are both versatile in terms of handling a wide range of process exhaust volumes and pollutant concentrations. However, RTOs are often preferred for applications where high destruction efficiencies and energy recovery are critical.

Overall, the key distinctions between a regenerative thermal oxidizer and a thermal oxidizer lie in the heat recovery mechanism, energy consumption, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. RTOs offer superior energy recovery and higher destruction efficiencies, making them an attractive option for industries that prioritize energy efficiency and environmental compliance.

editor by Dream 2024-04-30