Air Pollution Control Cases

Bulk Solid Waste Comprehensive Treatment: Integrated Dust Removal & Denitrification Project

Bulk Solid Waste Comprehensive Treatment: Integrated Dust Removal & Denitrification Project

A Technical Case Study on Multi-Pollutant Control Using Advanced RTO技术

1. Project Background & Overview

The comprehensive utilization of bulk solid waste represents a critical pillar in the national strategy for sustainable resource management and circular economy development. With China’s solid waste generation reaching unprecedented volumes, the effective treatment and resource recovery of construction debris, industrial slag, and municipal refuse has become an environmental imperative. During the 14th Five-Year Plan period, the nation has elevated comprehensive solid waste utilization to a strategic priority, mandating that disposal rates reach specified targets while minimizing landfill dependency.

The enterprise featured in this case study operates a large-scale facility dedicated to the resource recovery of construction and demolition waste. Their primary business encompasses the production of recycled aggregate concrete, eco-friendly bricks, and road base materials derived from processed construction debris. Established in 2005, the company has evolved into a comprehensive solid waste management enterprise with diversified operations spanning mining rehabilitation, tailings processing, industrial byproduct recycling, and renewable building material manufacturing.

With annual processing capacity exceeding 3 million cubic meters of construction waste, the facility generates substantial quantities of exhaust gases containing particulate matter, sulfur oxides, and nitrogen oxides during the crushing, screening, calcination, and material handling operations. The existing dust collection systems proved inadequate for meeting the increasingly stringent emission standards mandated by environmental protection authorities, necessitating a comprehensive upgrade to integrated multi-pollutant control technology.

Project Scale: The total investment for this environmental upgrade project reached approximately 32 million RMB, with environmental protection facilities accounting for 12 million RMB. The facility processes 1.2 million cubic meters of construction waste annually, producing 800,000 tons of recycled aggregate and 300,000 tons of eco-friendly building materials.

2. Pollution Source Analysis & Emission Characteristics

Comprehensive characterization of the facility’s emission profile was conducted through systematic monitoring and analysis. The primary pollution sources identified include raw material crushing and screening operations, rotary kiln calcination processes, material conveying and storage systems, and finished product packaging lines. The exhaust gas stream exhibits complex composition with high particulate loading, elevated moisture content, and significant temperature variations.

The environmental impact assessment for this project identified 24 distinct pollution factors requiring control measures. The following table presents the comprehensive emission inventory and baseline parameters:

Table 2-1: Environmental Pollution Factor Analysis

不。 Category Item Parameter / Value Unit Remarks
I. Pollution Source
1 Pollution Source Fuel Type & Designation Coal
2 Design Exhaust Gas Volume 45,000 m³/h
3 Operating Exhaust Gas Temperature 150 °C
4 Operating Exhaust Gas Volume 60,000 m³/h
5 Actual Moisture Content 12 ~ 14 %
6 Design Moisture Content 8 %
7 Excess Air Coefficient 1.4
8 Oxygen Content 6,000 %
II. Pollutant Characteristics
9 Pollutant Characteristics Particulate Matter 800 ~ 1,200 mg/m³
10 Sulfur Dioxide 120 mg/m³
11 Nitrogen Oxides 280 mg/m³
12 Fluorides 25 mg/m³
13 Hydrogen Chloride 15 mg/m³
14 重金属 20 mg/m³
15 水分含量 12 ~ 14 %
III. Treatment Process
16 Treatment Process Process Type Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization
17 Process Principle Limestone-Gypsum
18 中等的 Limestone Slurry
IV. Emission Standards
19 排放标准 Particulate Matter 30 mg/m³
20 Sulfur Dioxide 100 mg/m³
21 Nitrogen Oxides 200 mg/m³
22 Fluorides 6 mg/m³
23 Hydrogen Chloride 50 mg/m³
V. Treatment Efficiency
24 Treatment Efficiency Desulfurization Efficiency ≥95 %
25 Dust Removal Efficiency ≥99 %
26 Denitrification Efficiency ≥80 %

3. Treatment Solution & Engineering Design

The comprehensive treatment solution for this project was developed through rigorous technical evaluation and process optimization. The total project investment of 32 million RMB encompasses the construction of three primary production lines: one construction waste crushing and screening line with annual capacity of 600,000 cubic meters, one recycled aggregate washing and classification line processing 400,000 cubic meters annually, and one eco-friendly brick manufacturing line with annual output of 150 million standard bricks.

3.1 Process Flow Design

The exhaust gas treatment system employs a multi-stage integrated approach combining high-efficiency dust removal, wet flue gas desulfurization, and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) denitrification technologies. The process flow sequence is as follows:

1. Raw Gas Conditioning: Exhaust gas from the rotary kiln (150°C) enters the conditioning tower where temperature and humidity are adjusted to optimal levels for subsequent treatment stages.

2. Primary Dust Removal: High-temperature bag filter captures particulate matter with efficiency exceeding 99.5%, reducing dust loading from 1,000 mg/m³ to below 10 mg/m³.

3. Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization: Limestone-gypsum scrubbing system removes SO&sub2; with efficiency above 95%, achieving outlet concentration below 50 mg/m³.

4. SCR Denitrification: Selective catalytic reduction using vanadium-titanium catalyst reduces NOx from 280 mg/m³ to below 80 mg/m³ at 280-320°C operating temperature.

5. Secondary Dust Removal: Wet electrostatic precipitator ensures final particulate emission below 10 mg/m³.

6. Stack Emission: Treated gas is discharged through a 60-meter chimney meeting all regulatory requirements.

Figure 3-1: Process Flow Diagram of the Integrated Dust Removal & Denitrification System

3.2 Design Principles & Technical Requirements

The engineering design adheres to the following fundamental principles ensuring reliable, efficient, and sustainable operation:

● Advanced Technology Selection: The process route incorporates mature, proven technologies with demonstrated performance in similar applications. RTO-based desulfurization systems and SCR denitrification represent the state-of-the-art for multi-pollutant control in solid waste processing facilities.

● Comprehensive Process Design: Each production unit and emission point was individually analyzed to develop customized treatment strategies. The design accommodates variations in raw material composition, production scheduling, and seasonal operating conditions.

● System Reliability: Redundant equipment configurations, backup power systems, and automated control architectures ensure continuous compliance even during maintenance periods or equipment failures.

● Environmental Compliance: All design parameters exceed the minimum regulatory requirements, incorporating safety margins for fluctuating operating conditions and future standard tightening.

● Economic Optimization: Lifecycle cost analysis guided equipment selection, balancing capital expenditure against operational efficiency, energy consumption, and maintenance requirements.

● Operational Simplicity: Human-machine interface design prioritizes intuitive operation, minimizing training requirements and reducing operator error potential.

3.3 Equipment Selection & Configuration

The major equipment specifications were determined through detailed technical calculations and vendor qualification assessments. The following table summarizes the key equipment parameters:

Table 3-1: Main Equipment Specifications

不。 Item Unit Specification / Value
I. Flue Gas Treatment System
1 Exhaust Gas Volume m³/h 45,000 ~ 60,000
2 Inlet Gas Temperature °C 150
3 Outlet Gas Temperature °C 50 ~ 55
4 System Pressure Drop Pa ≤2,500
5 Design Inlet Dust Concentration mg/m³ 1,000
6 Design Outlet Dust Concentration mg/m³ ≤10
II. Dust Removal System
7 Filter Type Pulse Jet Bag Filter
8 Filter Area 4,500
9 Filter Material PTFE Membrane / Fiberglass
10 Filtration Velocity m/min 0.8 ~ 1.0
11 Cleaning Pressure MPa 0.3 ~ 0.5
12 Dust Removal Efficiency % ≥99.5
III. Desulfurization System
13 Process Type Limestone-Gypsum Wet FGD
14 SO&sub2; Inlet Concentration mg/m³ 120
15 SO&sub2; Outlet Concentration mg/m³ ≤50
16 Desulfurization Efficiency % ≥95
17 Absorber Diameter m 8.5
18 Absorber Height m 28
IV. Denitrification System
19 Process Type SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction)
20 NOx Inlet Concentration mg/m³ 280
21 NOx Outlet Concentration mg/m³ ≤80
22 Denitrification Efficiency % ≥80
23 Catalyst Type V&sub2;O&sub5;-WO&sub3;/TiO&sub2;
24 Catalyst Volume 45
25 工作温度 °C 280 ~ 320
V. Ductwork & Chimney
26 Main Duct Diameter mm Φ2,200 × 1,200
27 Chimney Height m 60
28 Chimney Diameter m Φ2.0
29 Insulation Thickness mm 150

Figure 3-2: 3D Design Model of the Integrated Treatment Facility

4. Operational Performance Analysis

4.1 Energy Consumption Analysis

The operational energy consumption was systematically monitored over a 24-month period following commissioning. The comprehensive energy audit reveals the following consumption patterns:

Table 4-1: Energy Consumption Analysis

不。 设备名称 Installed Power (kW) Operating Power (kW) Daily Time (h) Daily Consumption (kWh) Annual Days (d) Annual Consumption (10k kWh) Remarks
1 Induced Draft Fan 280 1 24 6,720 1 245
2 Booster Fan 75 1 24 1,800 1 66
3 Slurry Circulation Pump 90 1 24 2,160 1 79
4 Agglomeration Fan 15 1 24 360 1 13
5 Oxidation Fan 37 1 24 888 1 32
6 Vacuum Pump 7.5 1 24 180 1 7
7 Slurry Preparation System 11 1 24 264 1 10 Full-load (1 set)
8 Limestone Slurry Pump 15 1 24 360 1 13 Full-load (1 set)
9 Gypsum Discharge Pump 11 1 24 264 1 10 Full-load (1 set)
10 Process Water Pump 5.5 1 24 132 1 5 Full-load (1 set)
11 Cooling Water Pump 7.5 1 24 180 1 7 Full-load (1 set)
12 Ammonia Injection Pump 3 1 24 72 1 3 Full-load (1 set)
13 Compressed Air System 15 1 24 360 1 13
14 Instrumentation & Control 5 1 24 120 1 4
15 Lighting & Auxiliary 10 1 24 240 1 9
Total 13,200 516

The total annual electricity consumption for the environmental protection system reaches approximately 5.16 million kWh, with the induced draft fan and slurry circulation pumps representing the primary energy consumers. Operating at 24 hours per day, 330 days annually, the system maintains consistent treatment performance with power consumption of approximately 158 kWh per hour of operation.

4.2 Operating Cost Analysis

The economic viability of the treatment system was evaluated through detailed operating cost analysis. The following table presents the comprehensive cost breakdown:

Table 4-2: Operating Cost Analysis

不。 Cost Item Unit Unit Price (RMB) Daily Consumption Daily Cost (RMB) Annual Days Annual Cost (10k RMB) Remarks
1 Electricity kWh 0.8 13,200 10,560 330 348
2 Limestone ton 120 15 1,800 330 59
3 Ammonia (20%) ton 2,500 2.5 6,250 330 206
4 Process Water ton 3.5 200 700 330 23
5 Compressed Air 0.15 1,500 225 330 7
6 Bag Filter Replacement set 85,000 1 8.5 Every 2 years
7 Catalyst Replacement 15,000 1 67.5 Every 3 years
8 Labor Cost person 8,000/mo 8 persons 2,133 330 70
9 维护 500 330 17
Total Annual Operating Cost 806

The comprehensive annual operating cost totals approximately 8.06 million RMB, equating to 24.4 RMB per ton of processed construction waste. The ammonia consumption for SCR denitrification represents the largest single operating expense at 206 million RMB annually, followed by electricity consumption at 348 million RMB.

516

Annual Power (10k kWh)

806

Annual Cost (10k RMB)

24.4

Unit Cost (RMB/ton)

330

Annual Operating Days

4.3 Emission Compliance Monitoring

Continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) were installed at the stack outlet to verify compliance with regulatory standards. The following table presents the emission monitoring data:

Table 4-3: Emission Monitoring Data

不。 范围 Unit Standard Limit Actual Value 合规性
1 Particulate Matter mg/m³ ≤30 8.5 Pass
2 Sulfur Dioxide mg/m³ ≤100 45 Pass
3 Nitrogen Oxides mg/m³ ≤200 72 Pass
4 Fluorides mg/m³ ≤6 2.1 Pass
5 Hydrogen Chloride mg/m³ ≤50 18 Pass
6 Mercury & Compounds mg/m³ ≤0.05 0.012 Pass
7 Dioxins ng-TEQ/m³ ≤0.1 0.03 Pass
8 Stack Gas Temperature °C 52
9 Stack Gas Velocity m/s 12.5
10 Oxygen Content % 8.2

Figure 4-1: Completed Treatment Facility – Site Overview

5. Technical Performance & Achieved Results

5.1 Dust Removal Performance

The high-efficiency bag filter system demonstrated exceptional performance, consistently achieving outlet dust concentrations below 10 mg/m³ against an inlet loading of 1,000 mg/m³. The PTFE membrane fiberglass filter bags with pulse-jet cleaning system maintained stable pressure differential between 1,200-1,500 Pa throughout the monitoring period. The dust removal efficiency stabilized at 99.2%, significantly exceeding the design guarantee of 99%.

5.2 Desulfurization Performance

The limestone-gypsum wet flue gas desulfurization system achieved SO&sub2; removal efficiency of 96.8%, reducing inlet concentration from 120 mg/m³ to consistent outlet levels of 38-45 mg/m³. The system produced approximately 25 tons of commercial-grade gypsum daily as a valuable byproduct, generating additional revenue streams that partially offset operating costs. The liquid-to-gas ratio was optimized at 18 L/m³, balancing removal efficiency against pumping energy consumption.

5.3 Denitrification Performance

The SCR system utilizing V&sub2;O&sub5;-WO&sub3;/TiO&sub2; catalyst achieved NOx reduction efficiency of 82.5%, with outlet concentrations consistently maintained below 80 mg/m³. The ammonia slip was controlled below 3 ppm, preventing secondary pollution and minimizing ammonia consumption. Advanced NOx treatment solutions like this SCR configuration represent the most reliable approach for meeting stringent nitrogen oxide emission standards in solid waste processing applications.

Figure 5-1: SCADA Operating Interface – Real-Time System Monitoring

6. Operational Risk Assessment & Mitigation Strategies

6.1 Identified Risk Factors

Through two years of continuous operation, several risk factors requiring ongoing attention were identified:

1. Flue Gas Temperature Fluctuations: Variations in kiln operating conditions cause exhaust gas temperature fluctuations between 120-180°C, potentially affecting bag filter performance and catalyst activity. Temperature spikes above 200°C risk filter bag damage.

2. Raw Material Variability: Changes in construction waste composition directly impact emission characteristics. High-moisture or high-sulfur content materials require real-time process adjustments to maintain treatment efficiency.

3. Catalyst Deactivation: Gradual catalyst poisoning by heavy metals and alkali compounds reduces denitrification efficiency over time. Catalyst replacement every 3 years represents a significant capital expenditure.

4. Bag Filter Blinding: Oil and moisture in the exhaust gas can cause filter bag blinding, increasing pressure drop and reducing airflow capacity.

5. Ammonia Storage Safety: Large-volume ammonia storage presents safety hazards requiring strict compliance with hazardous chemical management protocols.

6.2 Mitigation Measures

The following countermeasures have been implemented to address identified risks:

● Temperature Stabilization: Installation of a gas conditioning tower with automatic water spray control maintains inlet temperature within the optimal range of 140-160°C for bag filter operation.

● Raw Material Pre-screening: Implementation of raw material classification and blending protocols ensures consistent feed composition, reducing emission variability.

● Catalyst Protection: Installation of upstream heavy metal removal system and periodic catalyst regeneration extends catalyst service life beyond the design specification.

● Filter Bag Monitoring: Continuous pressure differential monitoring with predictive maintenance algorithms enables proactive filter bag replacement before performance degradation.

● Safety Management: Comprehensive ammonia leak detection system with automatic ventilation and water spray emergency response ensures personnel safety and environmental protection.

7. Lessons Learned & Best Practices

7.1 Design Phase Insights

The project construction period extended to 8 months, slightly exceeding the initial 6-month schedule due to foundation reinforcement requirements and equipment delivery delays. Key design-phase lessons include:

● Comprehensive geotechnical investigation is essential before foundation design, as the treatment equipment imposes significant structural loads.

● Equipment procurement lead times for specialized components (SCR catalyst, high-temperature filter bags) should be factored into the project schedule with 3-month buffers.

● The integration of regenerative thermal oxidizer technology with conventional wet scrubbing requires careful thermal balance calculations to prevent condensation and corrosion.

● Redundant equipment configurations for critical components (induced draft fans, slurry pumps) are essential for maintaining continuous compliance.

7.2 Operational Excellence

Operational data over 24 months reveals several best practices for maintaining optimal system performance:

● Implementing a preventive maintenance schedule with weekly inspections of filter bag condition, monthly catalyst activity testing, and quarterly ductwork corrosion assessment.

● Maintaining detailed operating logs correlating production parameters with emission data enables rapid identification of performance deviations.

● Training operators on the fundamental principles of each treatment stage enhances troubleshooting capability and reduces response time to process upsets.

● Establishing strategic spare parts inventory for critical components (filter bags, pump seals, instrumentation) minimizes downtime during maintenance events.

7.3 Economic Optimization

Post-commissioning optimization efforts reduced unit treatment costs from the initial 28 RMB/ton to the current 24.4 RMB/ton through:

● Optimization of slurry circulation pump operating speed using variable frequency drives, reducing electricity consumption by 15%.

● Implementation of ammonia injection control based on continuous NOx monitoring, reducing ammonia consumption by 12% while maintaining compliance.

● Recovery and sale of desulfurization byproduct (gypsum) generating 1.2 million RMB annual revenue.

● Utilization of waste heat from the treated exhaust gas for process water preheating, reducing natural gas consumption in the kiln.

8. Conclusion & Recommendations

This case study demonstrates the successful application of integrated multi-pollutant control technology in a large-scale solid waste processing facility. The combination of high-efficiency dust removal, wet flue gas desulfurization, and SCR denitrification achieved consistent compliance with stringent emission standards while maintaining economic viability.

The total investment of 32 million RMB and annual operating cost of 8.06 million RMB represent a significant but necessary commitment for environmental stewardship. The achieved emission levels—particulate matter at 8.5 mg/m³, SO&sub2; at 45 mg/m³, and NOx at 72 mg/m³—demonstrate that modern RTO and desulfurization systems can reliably meet the most demanding regulatory requirements in challenging industrial applications.

For facilities planning similar upgrades, the following recommendations are offered based on this operational experience:

1. Conduct comprehensive baseline emission characterization before system design to ensure appropriate technology selection and sizing.

2. Prioritize equipment reliability and redundancy over minimal capital expenditure to ensure continuous compliance and avoid regulatory penalties.

3. Invest in operator training and predictive maintenance systems to maximize equipment availability and service life.

4. Explore waste heat recovery and byproduct valorization opportunities to improve overall project economics.

5. Plan for future emission standard tightening by incorporating design margins and upgrade pathways into the initial system configuration.

Key Takeaway: The integration of advanced dust removal, desulfurization, and denitrification technologies in a unified treatment train provides a robust solution for multi-pollutant control in solid waste processing facilities. With proper design, operation, and maintenance, these systems deliver reliable compliance with emission standards while generating valuable byproducts that offset operating costs. Ever-power RTO solutions offer proven technology platforms for achieving these environmental and economic objectives.

For more information about regenerative thermal oxidizer systems, NOx treatment solutions, desulfurization systems, and dust collection technology, please visit our comprehensive resource center.

© 2026 Ever-power Environmental Technology. All technical data presented in this case study is based on actual operational records.

 

rtoadmin

Recent Posts

Steel Industry Dedusting & Desulfurization Project

Steel Industry Dedusting & Desulfurization Project Integrated Flue Gas Treatment for Steel Manufacturing by Ever-power…

1 天 ago

New Energy Lithium Battery Industry Flue Gas Purification Project

 New Energy Lithium Battery Industry Flue Gas Purification Project Advanced Industrial Waste Gas Treatment for…

1 天 ago

Aluminum Alloy Special Aluminum Materials Industry: Dust Removal & Denitrification Project

 Aluminum Alloy Special Aluminum Materials Industry: Dust Removal & Denitrification Project A Comprehensive Technical Case…

4 天 ago

High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Material Graphitization Industry: Dust Removal, Desulfurization & Denitrification Project

High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Material Graphitization Industry: Dust Removal, Desulfurization & Denitrification Project A Comprehensive…

4 天 ago

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Implementation for Glass Fiber Manufacturing Emission Control

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Implementation for Glass Fiber Manufacturing Emission Control A Comprehensive Technical Case Study…

1 周 ago