Basic Info.
Model NO.
Amazing RTO
Type
Incinerator
Energy Saving
100
Easy for Operation
100
High Efficiency
100
Less Maintenance
100
Trademark
Bjamazing
Transport Package
Overseas Wooden
Specification
180*24
Origin
China
HS Code
8416100000
Product Description
RTO
รีเจนเนอเรทีฟ เทอร์มอล อ็อกซิไดเซอร์
Compared with traditional catalytic combustion,; direct thermal oxidizer,; RTO has the merits of high heating efficiency,; low operation cost,; and the ability to treat large flux low concentration waste gas.; When VOCs concentration is high,; secondary heat recycle can be realized,; which will greatly reduce the operation cost.; Because RTO can preheat the waste gas by levels through ceramic heat accumulator,; which could make the waste gas to be completely heated and cracked with no dead corner(treatment efficiency>99%);,;which reduce the NOX in the Exhausting gas,; if the VOC density >1500mg/Nm3,; when the waste gas reach cracking area,; it has been heated up to cracking temperature by heat accumulator,; the burner will be closed under this condition.;
RTO can be devided into chamber type and rotary type according to difference operation mode.; Rotary type RTO has advantages in system pressure,; temperature stability,; investment amount,; etc
| RTO types | Efficiency | Pressure change (mmAq); | Size | (max);Treatment volume | |
| Treatment efficiency | Heat recycle efficiency | ||||
| Rotary type RTO | 99 % | 97 % | 0-4 | small(1 time); | 50000Nm3/h |
| Three chamber type RTO | 99 % | 97 % | 0-10 | Large (1.;5times); | 100000Nm3/h |
| Two chamber type RTO | 95 % | 95 % | 0-20 | middle(1.;2times); | 100000Nm3/h |
Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer,; Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer,; Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer,; Thermal Oxidizer,; Thermal Oxidizer,; Thermal Oxidizer,; oxidizer,; oxidizer,; oxidizer,; incinerator,; incinerator,; incinerator,; waste gas treatment,; waste gas treatment,; waste gas treatment,; VOC treatment,; VOC treatment,; VOC treatment,; RTO,; RTO,; RTO,; RTO,; RTO,; RTO
Address: 8 floor, E1, Pinwei building, Dishengxi road, Yizhuang, ZheJiang , China
Business Type: Manufacturer/Factory, Trading Company
Business Range: Electrical & Electronics, Industrial Equipment & Components, Manufacturing & Processing Machinery, Metallurgy, Mineral & Energy
Management System Certification: ISO 9001, ISO 14001
Main Products: Rto, Color Coating Line, Galvanizing Line, Air Knife, Spares for Processing Line, Coater, Independent Equipments, Sink Roll, Revamping Project, Blower
Company Introduction: ZheJiang Amazing Science & Technology Co., Ltd is a thriving Hi-tech company, located in ZheJiang Economic and Technological Development Area(BDA). Adhering to the concept of Realistic, Innovative, Focused and Efficient, our company mainly serve the waste gas treatment (VOCs) Industry and metallurgical equipment of China and even whole world. We have advanced technology and rich experience in VOCs waste gas treatment project, the reference of which has been successfully applied to the industry of coating, rubber, electronic, printing, etc. We also have years of technology accumulation in the research and manufacturing of flat steel processing line, and possess nearly 100 of application example.
Our company focus on the research, design, manufacturing, installation and commissioning of VOCs organic waste gas treatment system and the revamping and updating project for energy saving and environmental protection of flat steel processing line. We can provide customers the complete solutions for environmental protection, energy saving, product quality improvement and other aspects.
We are also engaged in various spares and independent equipment for color coating line, galvanizing line, pickling line, like roller, coupler, heat exchanger, recuperator, air knife, blower, welder, tension leveler, skin pass, expansion joint, shear, jointer, stitcher, burner, radiant tube, gear motor, reducer, etc.
What are the limitations of regenerative thermal oxidizers?
While regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) are widely used for air pollution control, they do have certain limitations that should be considered. Here are some key limitations of RTOs:
- High Capital Cost: RTOs typically have higher capital costs compared to other air pollution control technologies. The complexity of the regenerative heat exchanger system, which enables high energy efficiency, can contribute to the higher upfront investment required for RTO installation.
- Space Requirements: RTOs generally require a larger footprint compared to some other air pollution control devices. The presence of regenerative heat exchangers, combustion chambers, and associated equipment necessitates adequate space for installation. This can be a limitation for industries with limited available space.
- High Energy Consumption during Startup: RTOs require a certain amount of time and energy to reach their optimal operating temperature during startup. This initial energy consumption can be relatively high, and it is important to consider this aspect when planning the operational schedule and energy management of an RTO system.
- Limitations in Handling Low Concentration VOCs: RTOs may have limitations in effectively treating low concentration volatile organic compounds (VOCs). If the VOC concentrations in the exhaust gas are too low, the energy required to maintain the necessary temperature for oxidation may be higher than the energy released during the combustion process. In such cases, other air pollution control technologies or pre-concentration techniques may be more suitable.
- Particulate Matter Control: RTOs are not specifically designed for controlling particulate matter emissions. While they may provide some incidental removal of fine particulate matter, their removal efficiency for particulates is generally lower compared to dedicated particulate control devices such as fabric filters (baghouses) or electrostatic precipitators.
- Chemically Corrosive Gases: RTOs may not be suitable for treating exhaust gases containing highly corrosive compounds. The high temperatures within the RTO can accelerate corrosion of materials, and the presence of corrosive gases may require additional corrosion-resistant materials or alternative air pollution control technologies.
Despite these limitations, RTOs remain an effective and widely used technology for the destruction of gaseous pollutants in various industrial applications. It is important to evaluate the specific requirements, characteristics of the exhaust gases, and environmental regulations when considering the implementation of an RTO system.
Can regenerative thermal oxidizers be used for treating emissions from wood processing operations?
Yes, regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) can be used effectively for treating emissions from wood processing operations. Wood processing operations, such as sawmills, veneer production, and wood product manufacturing, can generate various pollutants, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). Here are some key points regarding the use of RTOs for treating emissions from wood processing operations:
- Emission Control: RTOs are designed to achieve high destruction efficiencies for VOCs and HAPs. These pollutants are oxidized within the RTO at high temperatures, typically above 95% efficiency, converting them into carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapor. This ensures effective control and reduction of emissions from wood processing operations.
- Process Compatibility: RTOs can be integrated into the exhaust systems of various wood processing operations, capturing and treating the emissions before they are released into the atmosphere. The RTO is typically connected to the process equipment or exhaust stack, allowing the VOC-laden air to pass through the oxidizer for treatment.
- Flexibility: RTOs offer flexibility in handling a wide range of operating conditions and pollutants. Wood processing operations can vary in terms of flow rates, temperature, and composition of emissions. RTOs are designed to accommodate these variations and provide effective treatment even under fluctuating conditions.
- Particulate Removal: Wood processing operations may also generate particulate matter, such as wood dust or sawdust. While RTOs are primarily designed for treating gaseous pollutants, they can be complemented with additional particulate control devices, such as cyclones or fabric filters, to address particulate emissions and ensure compliance with air quality standards.
- Heat Recovery: RTOs incorporate heat exchange systems that allow for the recovery and reuse of thermal energy. The heat exchangers within the RTO capture the heat from the outgoing exhaust gases and transfer it to the incoming process air or gas stream. This heat recovery process improves the overall energy efficiency of the system and reduces the need for additional fuel consumption.
- Compliance with Regulations: Wood processing operations are subject to regulatory requirements for air quality and emissions control. RTOs are capable of achieving the necessary destruction efficiencies and can help wood processors comply with environmental regulations. The use of RTOs demonstrates a commitment to sustainable practices and responsible management of air emissions.
It is important to note that the specific design and configuration of the RTO, as well as the characteristics of the wood processing emissions, should be considered when implementing an RTO for a specific application. Consulting with experienced engineers or RTO manufacturers can provide valuable insights into the proper sizing, integration, and performance requirements for treating emissions from wood processing operations.
In summary, RTOs are a suitable and effective technology for treating emissions from wood processing operations, providing high destruction efficiencies, compatibility with various processes, flexibility in handling operating conditions, potential for particulate removal, heat recovery, and compliance with environmental regulations.
How do regenerative thermal oxidizers compare to other air pollution control devices?
Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) are highly regarded air pollution control devices that offer several advantages over other commonly used air pollution control technologies. Here’s a comparison of RTOs with some other air pollution control devices:
| Comparison | Regenerative Thermal Oxidizers (RTOs) | Electrostatic Precipitators (ESPs) | Scrubbers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency | RTOs achieve high VOC destruction efficiency, typically exceeding 99%. They are highly effective in destroying volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). | ESPs are effective in collecting particulate matter, such as dust and smoke, but they are less effective in destroying VOCs and HAPs. | Scrubbers are efficient in removing certain pollutants, such as gases and particulate matter, but their performance may vary depending on the specific pollutants being targeted. |
| Applicability | RTOs are suitable for a wide range of industries and applications, including high-volume exhaust gases. They can handle varying concentrations and types of pollutants. | ESPs are commonly used for particulate matter control in applications such as power plants, cement kilns, and steel mills. They are less suitable for VOC and HAP control. | Scrubbers are widely used for removing acid gases, such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) and hydrogen chloride (HCl), as well as certain odorous compounds. They are often employed in industries such as chemical manufacturing and wastewater treatment. |
| Energy Efficiency | RTOs incorporate heat recovery systems that allow for significant energy savings. They can achieve high thermal efficiency by preheating the incoming process air using the heat from the outgoing exhaust stream. | ESPs consume relatively low energy compared to other technologies, but they do not offer heat recovery capabilities. | Scrubbers generally consume more energy compared to RTOs and ESPs due to the energy required for liquid atomization and pumping. However, some scrubber designs may incorporate heat recovery mechanisms. |
| Space Requirements | RTOs typically require more space compared to ESPs and certain scrubber designs due to the need for ceramic media beds and larger combustion chambers. | ESPs have a compact design and require less space compared to RTOs and some scrubber configurations. | Scrubber designs vary in size and complexity. Certain scrubber types, such as packed bed scrubbers, may require a larger footprint compared to RTOs and ESPs. |
| Maintenance | RTOs generally require regular maintenance of components such as valves, dampers, and ceramic media beds. Periodic media replacement may be necessary depending on the operating conditions. | ESPs require periodic cleaning of collection plates and electrodes. Maintenance activities involve the removal of accumulated particulate matter. | Scrubbers require maintenance of liquid circulation systems, pumps, and mist eliminators. Regular monitoring and adjustment of the chemical reagents used in the scrubbing process are also necessary. |
It’s important to note that the selection of an air pollution control device depends on the specific pollutants, process conditions, regulatory requirements, and economic considerations of the industrial application. Each technology has its own advantages and limitations, and it’s essential to evaluate these factors to determine the most appropriate solution for effective air pollution control.
editor by CX 2024-03-20
TH 
EN 
ZH 
ES 
AR 
ID 
PT 
FR 
JA 
RU 
DE 
MS 
CS 
BG 
NL 
KO 
RO 
SK 
VI 
ZH_TW 
UK