Air Pollution Control Cases

Steel Industry Dedusting & Desulfurization Project

Steel Industry Dedusting & Desulfurization Project

Integrated Flue Gas Treatment for Steel Manufacturing by Ever-power RTO Systems

1. Project Overview

1.1 Industry Background

The steel manufacturing sector generates substantial quantities of dust and particulate matter throughout its operational cycle, with byproduct dust and ash arising from multiple production stages including electric arc furnaces, blast furnaces, sintering operations, and smelting processes. In particular, the sintering and refining phases produce significant volumes of dust-laden exhaust that, if left untreated, pose serious environmental and public health risks. The steelmaking stage represents one of the most intensive sources of particulate emissions, with electric furnace operations generating dust at rates of 12 to 20 kilograms per metric ton of steel produced, and iron oxide content in the dust stream frequently exceeding 40% by mass.

Beyond the steel sector itself, related heavy industries including crane manufacturing, electrical equipment production, and shipbuilding generate comparable dust emissions that compound regional air quality challenges. Effective dust management within steel plants therefore demands not merely collection and containment, but also resource recovery and circular utilization strategies that transform waste streams into valuable secondary raw materials. The annual discharge of dust ash from steel operations has reached enormous scales, creating urgent imperatives for comprehensive emission control infrastructure.

This project addresses the rotary kiln combustion exhaust from a steel production facility, targeting the removal of sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and acidic gas constituents to achieve full compliance with the stringent Steel Industry Air Pollutant Ultra-Low Emission Standard (DB13/2169-2018). The facility utilizes natural gas as its primary fuel, and the treatment system has been engineered to reduce outlet SO2 concentrations below 20 mg/Nm3, particulate matter below 5 mg/Nm3, and eliminate visible white plume trailing phenomena through integrated regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) and flue gas purification technologies.

1.2 Enterprise Profile

The project owner operates as a prominent steel enterprise headquartered in Tangshan, Hebei Province, established in 2004. The company maintains domestic-leading structural steel and high-speed wire rod production lines, having developed a vertically integrated steel marketing industrial chain encompassing steelmaking, rolling, processing, warehousing, and logistics operations. Its product portfolio serves markets across China and exports to international destinations worldwide, with a customer base exceeding 6,000 domestic and foreign clients.

The enterprise adheres to a development philosophy centered on green, clean, and low-carbon manufacturing principles, with comprehensive energy conservation and environmental protection facilities installed throughout all production stages. The facility employs reverse osmosis technology for wastewater treatment, achieving treated water quality surpassing drinking water standards and realizing true zero-discharge wastewater management. The company has also successfully developed and implemented waste heat recovery systems utilizing blast furnace slag water and flue gas heat for wood drying applications, demonstrating industry-leading innovation in energy cascade utilization.

Committed to achieving the Steel Industry Air Pollutant Ultra-Low Emission Standard (DB13/2169-2018), the enterprise has invested in upgrading its rotary kiln combustion system and installing advanced flue gas treatment infrastructure including acid gas scrubbing, wet desulfurization, wet electrostatic precipitation, and flue gas plume suppression systems. These environmental technologies have substantially elevated the facility’s pollution control capabilities while contributing positively to regional air quality improvement.

2. Pollutant Sources & Environmental Data Analysis

The environmental treatment data analysis for this steel industry project is comprehensively summarized in the following table:

Nee. Category Item Steel Industry Unit Remarks
1 Pollution Source Kiln Type Rotary Kiln
2 Fuel (Natural Gas) Consumption 5,500 m3/h
3 Standard Flue Gas Volume 56,890 Nm3/h
4 Flue Gas Temperature 150~160 °C
5 Operating Flue Gas Volume 90,213 Nm3/h
6 Actual Oxygen Content 15 %
7 Baseline Oxygen Content 12 %
8 Fan Power 200 kW
9 Duct Parameters Wind Pressure 5,000 Pa
10 Duct Diameter φ1,820 mm
11 Initial Concentration Parameters Nitrogen Oxides 50 mg/Nm3
12 Sulfur Dioxide 2,800 mg/Nm3
13 Particulate Matter 100 mg/Nm3
14 Carbon Monoxide 4,000 mg/Nm3
15 Hydrogen Fluoride 15 mg/Nm3
16 Hydrogen Chloride 50 mg/Nm3
17 Temperature Points Before Dust Removal 60 °C
18 Before Desulfurization 150 °C
19 Plume Suppression Inlet 55 °C
20 Humidity
21 Corrosivity Other Corrosive Substances & Concentration 30 mg/Nm3 NaCl
22 Treatment Process Desulfurization Limestone-Gypsum Method
23 Dust Removal Wet Electrostatic Precipitator
24 Deacidification Wet Deacidification
25 Plume Suppression MGGH Heat Exchange
26 Discharge Standard Requirements Emission Standard DB13/2169-2018 Steel Industry Ultra-Low Emission Standard
27 Nitrogen Oxides 50 mg/Nm3
28 Sulfur Dioxide 20 mg/Nm3
29 Particulate Matter 5 mg/Nm3
30 Carbon Monoxide 100 mg/Nm3
31 Hydrogen Fluoride 5 mg/Nm3
32 Hydrogen Chloride 20 mg/Nm3
33 Plume Suppression No Visible White Plume
34 Treatment Efficiency Desulfurization Efficiency 99.28 %
35 Denitrification Efficiency %
36 Dust Removal Efficiency 75 %
37 Carbon Monoxide Removal Efficiency 97.50 %
38 Hydrogen Fluoride Removal Efficiency 66.67 %
39 Hydrogen Chloride Removal Efficiency 60.00 %

The pollutant profile for this steel industry application presents several distinctive characteristics that informed the treatment strategy. The flue gas stream exhibits exceptionally high sulfur dioxide concentrations (2,800 mg/Nm3) attributable to sulfur-containing raw materials and fuel combustion within the rotary kiln. Particulate matter levels (100 mg/Nm3) comprise primarily iron oxide fines, metallic dusts, and combustion ash. Acid gas constituents including hydrogen fluoride (15 mg/Nm3) and hydrogen chloride (50 mg/Nm3) originate from chlorides and fluorides present in the ore feedstock and fuel. The elevated carbon monoxide concentration (4,000 mg/Nm3) reflects incomplete combustion within the rotary kiln system. The presence of sodium chloride at 30 mg/Nm3 introduces additional corrosion risks that must be addressed through appropriate materials selection.

The DB13/2169-2018 ultra-low emission standard mandates stringent outlet limits: SO2 ≤20 mg/Nm3, particulate matter ≤5 mg/Nm3, NOx ≤50 mg/Nm3, CO ≤100 mg/Nm3, HF ≤5 mg/Nm3, and HCl ≤20 mg/Nm3. Achieving these targets requires treatment efficiencies exceeding 99% for sulfur dioxide and 95% for particulate matter, necessitating a multi-stage integrated approach combining RTO systems for DeSOx with advanced particulate capture technologies.

3. Treatment Solution Design

3.1 Process Route Selection

The enterprise has established an integrated environmental management and control platform incorporating air quality micro-stations and total suspended particulate concentration monitoring instruments to achieve comprehensive real-time monitoring, early warning, and intelligent coordinated control of emissions. These measures have substantially elevated the facility’s environmental governance capabilities and enabled successful achievement of ultra-low emission targets.

The flue gas treatment process train operates as follows: After passing through the bag filter dust removal system, the 160°C flue gas is directed into an MGGH (Media Gas-Gas Heat Exchanger) cooler, reducing the gas temperature to 115°C while simultaneously heating the thermal medium water from 89°C to 109°C. The cooled flue gas then enters a scrubbing tower equipped with three spray levels for effective removal of HCl and other acidic gas constituents. Following acid gas neutralization, the gas stream proceeds to the desulfurization tower for sulfur dioxide removal, utilizing four spray levels to ensure adequate SO2 absorption. The desulfurized gas then passes through a wet electrostatic precipitator for final particulate polishing, achieving full emission compliance while eliminating visible white plume trailing phenomena. This integrated regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) approach exemplifies best practices for steel industry emission control.

Figure 1: Integrated Flue Gas Treatment Process Flow Diagram for Steel Manufacturing

3.2 Design Model

The 3D design models illustrate the spatial configuration of major treatment equipment, ductwork routing, and auxiliary system integration. The layout optimizes equipment spacing for maintenance access while minimizing pressure losses through streamlined duct configurations. The induced draft fans are positioned to protect rotating equipment from corrosive gas exposure, while the stack is located at the highest elevation point to ensure adequate natural draft and dispersion characteristics.

Figure 2: 3D Design Model 1 of the Integrated Steel Industry Flue Gas Purification Facility

Figure 3: 3D Design Model 2 of the Integrated Steel Industry Flue Gas Purification Facility

3.3 Process Requirements & Design Considerations

The flue gas plume suppression technology employed in this project represents a mature and reliable approach, with all selected equipment, accessory materials, manufacturing processes, and inspection requirements meeting or exceeding relevant national standards. The system is designed to maintain consistent plume suppression efficiency across the full range of anticipated operating variations in dust content, sulfur dioxide concentration, and acid gas levels.

The MGGH heat exchanger system incorporates specialized design provisions to prevent tube wear, leakage, and corrosion issues. Appropriate stainless steel tubing selection, optimized flue gas velocity profiles, and refined duct structural configurations collectively reduce corrosion rates and extend equipment service life, enhancing the universal applicability of MGGH technology across diverse industrial contexts.

Engineering site layout planning ensures adequate space allocation for all system equipment. The treatment process generates no secondary pollution, and system reagents are sourced from stable, reliable supply chains. All procured equipment represents premium domestic and international brands. The process design emphasizes energy and water conservation through the application of energy-efficient technologies and equipment, reducing both capital investment and operational expenditures.

Ambient noise levels surrounding the treatment facility comply with Class II standards under the Industrial Enterprise Boundary Environmental Noise Emission Standard (GB 12348-2008), with equipment operating noise maintained below 85 dB at a 1-meter measurement distance. The modular design concept accommodates evolving environmental requirements across different operational periods. The advanced process technology simultaneously eliminates visual pollution and reduces atmospheric pollutant emissions, achieving ultra-low discharge levels that satisfy both current and anticipated regulatory frameworks over the next three to five years.

3.4 Design Calculation Summary

The design calculations for this project are summarized in the following comprehensive tables:

3.4.1 Flue Gas Cooling Heat Exchanger

Nee. Item Unit Value
1 Flue Gas Volume m3/h 52,320
2 Heat Exchange Area m2 400
3 Equipment Pressure Drop Pa 430
4 Hot Side Inlet Temperature °C 160
5 Hot Side Outlet Temperature °C 115
6 Thermal Medium Water Inlet Temperature °C 89
7 Thermal Medium Water Outlet Temperature °C 109
8 Equipment Dimensions mm×mm×mm 3,000×2,120×3,524

3.4.2 Scrubbing Tower

Nee. Item Unit Value
1 Flue Gas Volume m3/h 80,841
2 Inlet Flue Gas Temperature °C 115
3 Outlet Flue Gas Temperature °C 65
4 Wind Speed m/s 2.4
5 Scrubbing Tower Diameter m φ3.5
6 Spray Layers Layer 2
7 Single Pump Flow Rate m3/h 80
8 Scrubbing Tower Height m 23

3.4.3 Desulfurization Tower

Nee. Item Unit Value
1 Flue Gas Volume m3/h 70,500
2 Flue Gas Temperature °C 65
3 SO2 Inlet Concentration mg/Nm3 2,800
4 SO2 Outlet Concentration mg/Nm3 20
5 Calcium-to-Sulfur Ratio 1.05
6 Wind Speed m/s <3.2
7 Tower Inner Diameter m φ2.8
8 Liquid-to-Gas Ratio 22.8
9 Spray Layers Layer 4
10 Single Pump Flow Rate m3/h 325
11 Slurry Retention Time h 3.5
12 Limestone Operating Consumption kg/h 275
13 Gypsum Production kg/h 395
14 Gypsum Moisture Content % 12~15
15 Demister 2-Layer Ridge + 1-Layer Tube Type
16 Limestone Silo Volume m3 30
17 Service Life d 4.5

3.4.4 Wet Electrostatic Precipitator

Nee. Item Unit Value
1 Flue Gas Volume m3/h 70,500
2 Flue Gas Temperature °C 65
3 Precipitator Design Velocity m/s 1.4
4 Anode Tube Effective Cross-Sectional Area m2 14.16
5 Dust Collection Area m2 943.5
6 Outlet Dust Emission Concentration mg/Nm3 5
7 Body Resistance Pa 300
8 Anode Tube Specifications mm×mm Inscribed Circle φ360×6,000
9 Anode Tube / Cathode Wire Total Quantity Piece 128
10 Cathode Wire Material 2205
11 Power Supply Type High Frequency Power Supply
12 Power Supply Parameters 72 kV / 800 mA
13 Specific Collection Area m2/(m3·s) 37

3.4.5 Flue Gas Reheating Heat Exchanger

Nee. Item Unit Value
1 Flue Gas Volume m3/h 53,366.4
2 Heat Exchange Area m2 812
3 Equipment Pressure Drop Pa 370
4 Flue Gas Inlet Temperature °C 50
5 Flue Gas Outlet Temperature °C 90
6 Thermal Medium Water Inlet Temperature °C 108
7 Thermal Medium Water Outlet Temperature °C 90
8 Equipment Dimensions mm×mm×mm 3,000×2,120×4,004

3.4.6 Induced Draft Fan

Nee. Item Unit Value
1 Single Unit Flow Rate m3/h 90,000
2 Wind Pressure Pa 6,000
3 Bedrijfstemperatuur °C 150
4 Single Unit Power kW 220

4. Operation Analysis

4.1 Energy Consumption Analysis

The energy consumption analysis for this project is detailed in the following comprehensive equipment power summary table:

Nee. Naam van de apparatuur Single Unit Rated Power (kW) Total Units Total Power (kW) Actual Working Units Actual Working Power (kW) Operating Status
1 Main Induced Draft Fan 220 1 220 1 220
2 Desulfurization Tower Circulation Pump 55 4 220 3 165 Full Operation Considered
3 Slurry Transfer Pump 7.5 2 15 1 7.5 1 Standby, 1 Operation (Intermittent)
4 Oxidation Blower 22 3 66 2 44 2 in Use, 1 Standby
5 Desulfurization Tower Side Agitator 4 3 12 3 12 Full Operation
6 Fluidization Fan Heater 5.5 1 5.5 1 5.5 Full Operation Considered (Actual Intermittent)
7 Star-Type Feeder 0.55 1 0.55 1 0.55 Full Operation Considered (Actual Intermittent)
8 Rapping Motor 0.25 1 1.1 1 0.25 Full Operation Considered (Actual Intermittent)
9 Screw Conveyor 2.2 1 2.2 1 2.2 Full Operation Considered (Actual Intermittent)
10 Limestone Slurry Tank Agitator 4 1 4 1 4 Full Operation
11 Slurry Pump 4 2 8 1 4 1 Standby, 1 Operation (Intermittent)
12 Gypsum Discharge Pump 22 2 44 1 22 1 Standby, 1 Operation (Intermittent)
13 Vacuum Belt Filter 37 1 37 1 37 Full Operation Considered (Actual Intermittent 2h)
14 Filtrate Agitator 4 1 4 1 4 Full Operation
15 Filtrate Transfer Pump 3 2 6 1 3 1 Standby, 1 Operation (Intermittent)
16 Emergency Discharge Pump 15 1 15 1 15 1 Standby, 1 Operation (Intermittent)
17 Emergency Agitator 7.5 1 7.5 1 7.5 Intermittent Operation
18 Tower Area Discharge Pump 2.2 2 4.4 1 2.2 1 Standby, 1 Operation (Intermittent)
19 Tower Area Agitator 4 1 4 1 4 Full Operation
20 Process Water Pump 5.5 2 11 1 5.5 1 Standby, 1 Operation
21 Flushing Water Pump 15 2 30 1 15 1 Standby, 1 Operation (Intermittent)
22 Heat Exchanger Water Pump 22 2 44 1 22 1 Standby, 1 Operation
23 Wet Electrostatic Precipitator 57.6 1 57.6 1 57.6 Full Operation
24 Shielded Fan 11 2 22 2 22 Full Operation
25 Conduction Box Electric Heater 2 4 8 4 8 Full Operation
26 Shielded Box Electric Heater 0.3 4 1.2 4 1.2 Full Operation
Total 850.05 691

The maximum operating load for the main equipment reaches 691 kW, with continuous 24-hour daily operation. At an average electricity tariff of 0.36 CNY/(kW·h), the daily electricity cost is 5,970.24 CNY. Based on 8,000 annual operating hours, the annual electricity expenditure amounts to 1,990,080 CNY.

Water consumption is primarily associated with equipment flushing, system makeup, and cooling water, totaling approximately 3 tons per hour. At a water unit price of 2 CNY/ton, the daily water cost is 144 CNY, yielding an annual water expenditure of 48,000 CNY based on 8,000 operating hours.

Limestone consumption is 0.275 tons per hour. At a unit price of 250 CNY/ton, the daily limestone cost is 1,650 CNY, corresponding to an annual limestone expenditure of 550,000 CNY based on 8,000 operating hours.

4.2 Emission Compliance Data

The following table presents the comprehensive emission compliance monitoring data for this project:

Nee. Category Item Steel Industry Unit
1 Treatment Process Deacidification Scrubbing Tower
2 Desulfurization Limestone-Gypsum Method
3 Dust Removal Bag Filter + Wet Electrostatic Precipitator
4 Plume Suppression MGGH Heat Exchange
5 Emission Standard Standard DB13/2169-2018
6 Design Discharge Standard Requirements Sulfur Dioxide 20 mg/m3
7 Particulate Matter 5 mg/m3
8 Carbon Monoxide 100 mg/m3
9 Hydrogen Fluoride 5 mg/m3
10 Hydrogen Chloride 15 mg/m3
11 Sulfur Dioxide 20 mg/m3
12 Plume Suppression No Visible White Plume
13 Design Treatment Efficiency Desulfurization Efficiency 99.3 %
14 Dust Removal Efficiency 75 %
15 Actual Discharge Data After Treatment Sulfur Dioxide 10 mg/m3
16 Particulate Matter 3 mg/m3
17 Hydrogen Fluoride 2 mg/m3
18 Hydrogen Chloride 6 mg/m3
19 Plume Suppression No Visible White Plume
20 Actual Treatment Efficiency Desulfurization Efficiency 99.7 %
21 Deacidification Efficiency 80 %
22 Dust Removal Efficiency 90 %

The emission compliance data demonstrates that the integrated treatment system consistently achieves outlet concentrations significantly below the regulatory limits mandated by DB13/2169-2018. Sulfur dioxide outlet levels remain at 10 mg/m3 against a standard of 20 mg/m3, while particulate matter concentrations are controlled at 3 mg/m3 compared to the 5 mg/m3 limit. Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride emissions are maintained at 2 mg/m3 and 6 mg/m3 respectively, both comfortably below their respective standards of 5 mg/m3 and 15 mg/m3. The actual desulfurization efficiency reaches 99.7%, deacidification efficiency achieves 80%, and dust removal efficiency attains 90%, all validating the effectiveness of the advanced dust collector system and integrated treatment approach for demanding steel industry applications.

5. Project Summary & Experience

5.1 Technical Summary

This project employs an integrated treatment train combining scrubbing tower deacidification, wet flue gas desulfurization, wet electrostatic precipitation, and MGGH heat exchanger technologies. The system fully utilizes waste heat from the facility’s own exhaust stream for flue gas plume suppression, simultaneously reducing low-temperature corrosion of ductwork and chimney structures while achieving ultra-low pollutant discharge levels below the regulatory standard limits. The core technical innovation lies in the dynamic adjustment of equipment operating parameters and process conditions in response to variations in sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and temperature within the flue gas stream, ultimately realizing the ultra-low emission target with no visible plume at the chimney outlet.

5.2 Project Completion Images

The following images document the completed flue gas purification facility and its operational status:

Figure 4: Completed Flue Gas Purification Facility at the Steel Manufacturing Site

5.3 Operational Images

Figure 5: DCS Control System Monitoring Interface for Real-Time Emission Management

5.4 Operational Risk Analysis

(1) Primary Operational Risks:

① Fluctuations in flue gas temperature, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide concentrations can cause unstable system discharge performance.

② Malfunction of upstream dust removal equipment can lead to heat exchanger fouling and blockage due to excessive particulate loading.

③ Pipeline damage during production operations may result in wastewater overflow incidents.

④ Equipment and ductwork corrosion during production can reduce structural integrity and equipment strength.

(2) Mitigation Measures:

① Maintain close communication and information sharing between the flue gas purification system and production equipment. In the event of operational fluctuations, advance notification enables coordinated response.

② Install particulate concentration monitoring instruments at the MGGH heat exchanger cooling section inlet for real-time dust tracking, supplemented by ash removal devices operating continuously.

③ Strengthen personnel patrols and inspections to maintain normal equipment operation.

④ Continuously enhance the safety awareness and operational skills of relevant personnel, regularly revise safety measures and emergency plans to ensure effective incident response.

5.5 Key Technical Insights

The successful implementation of this project yields several valuable insights for similar steel industry flue gas treatment applications:

Heat Recovery Integration: The MGGH heat exchanger system enables effective heat recovery from high-temperature flue gas, simultaneously addressing plume suppression requirements and reducing thermal energy losses. This approach exemplifies best practices in RTO thermal management for industrial exhaust streams.

Corrosion Protection: The combination of acid gas scrubbing, temperature conditioning through MGGH, and corrosion-resistant materials (2205 stainless steel for WESP components) effectively addresses the aggressive corrosion environment characteristic of steel industry flue gas.

Modular Redundancy: The dual-unit configuration for all critical rotating equipment ensures continuous operation during maintenance activities, achieving system availability exceeding 98%.

Byproduct Valorization: The gypsum byproduct meets construction-grade specifications and has been successfully commercialized, partially offsetting operational costs.

Intelligent Control: The integrated environmental management platform with real-time monitoring and predictive control capabilities ensures consistent emission compliance across variable operating conditions.

Conclusie

This case study demonstrates the successful application of integrated multi-pollutant flue gas treatment technology for steel manufacturing operations. The scrubbing tower deacidification, limestone-gypsum desulfurization, wet electrostatic precipitation, and MGGH heat recovery treatment train achieves comprehensive control of sulfur dioxide, acid gases, particulate matter, and visible plume phenomena while maintaining operational efficiency and economic viability.

The project validates the critical importance of process integration, heat recovery optimization, and corrosion-resistant design in addressing the complex emission challenges characteristic of steel industry rotary kiln operations. As environmental regulations continue to tighten and corporate sustainability commitments intensify, such integrated RTO systems for DeSOx and flue gas treatment solutions will become increasingly essential for steel producers seeking to balance environmental stewardship with operational competitiveness.

For organizations evaluating similar waste gas treatment investments within the steel, metallurgical, or heavy industrial sectors, this implementation provides a proven reference framework adaptable to diverse operational contexts. The technical insights and operational lessons documented herein offer valuable guidance for project planning, equipment selection, commissioning execution, and long-term performance optimization.

Related Resources & Solutions

© Ever-power RTO Systems | Industrial Waste Gas Treatment Solutions

For technical inquiries: [SALES_EMAIL]

 

rtobeheerder

Recent Posts

New Energy Lithium Battery Industry Flue Gas Purification Project

 New Energy Lithium Battery Industry Flue Gas Purification Project Advanced Industrial Waste Gas Treatment for…

9 uur ago

Aluminum Alloy Special Aluminum Materials Industry: Dust Removal & Denitrification Project

 Aluminum Alloy Special Aluminum Materials Industry: Dust Removal & Denitrification Project A Comprehensive Technical Case…

3 dagen ago

High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Material Graphitization Industry: Dust Removal, Desulfurization & Denitrification Project

High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Anode Material Graphitization Industry: Dust Removal, Desulfurization & Denitrification Project A Comprehensive…

3 dagen ago

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Implementation for Glass Fiber Manufacturing Emission Control

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer Implementation for Glass Fiber Manufacturing Emission Control A Comprehensive Technical Case Study…

1 week ago

Steel Industry Sintering Flue Gas Denitrification & Plume Elimination Project

Steel Industry Sintering Flue Gas Denitrification & Plume Elimination Project A Comprehensive Technical Case Study…

1 week ago